2013
DOI: 10.1504/ijbic.2013.058910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

True global optimality of the pressure vessel design problem: a benchmark for bio-inspired optimisation algorithms

Abstract: The pressure vessel design problem is a well-known design benchmark for validating bioinspired optimization algorithms. However, its global optimality is not clear and there has been no mathematical proof put forward. In this paper, a detailed mathematical analysis of this problem is provided that proves that 6059.714335048436 is the global minimum. The Lagrange multiplier method is also used as an alternative proof and this method is extended to find the global optimum of a cantilever beam design problem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the results presented in Table 22, it can be seen that there are only four methods (rank-iMDDE, NDE, COMDE and UFA) that are able to solve this problem in all runs. There is some error related to the best result reported by the AFA in (Baykasolu and Ozsoydan 2015), since it is less than the optimal solution 6059.714335048436 which is proved by a detailed mathematical analysis in Yang et al (2013b). Among all compared approaches, the UFA has obtained the smallest standard deviation value, with the exception of the COMDE.…”
Section: Results For Pressure Vessel Design Problemmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…From the results presented in Table 22, it can be seen that there are only four methods (rank-iMDDE, NDE, COMDE and UFA) that are able to solve this problem in all runs. There is some error related to the best result reported by the AFA in (Baykasolu and Ozsoydan 2015), since it is less than the optimal solution 6059.714335048436 which is proved by a detailed mathematical analysis in Yang et al (2013b). Among all compared approaches, the UFA has obtained the smallest standard deviation value, with the exception of the COMDE.…”
Section: Results For Pressure Vessel Design Problemmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ke et al (2016) applied fruit fly optimization algorithm (FOA) to the pressure vessel problem and compared it with the results of PSO and quantum artificial fish swarm algorithm. Yang et al (2013) performed a detailed mathematical study and stated that the global optimum is 6,059.714335048436. They found the same result with the Lagrange multiplier (LM) method.…”
Section: Hybrid Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same parameter settings as before, the results of 20 independent runs are summarized and compared in Table 4. In fact, all these algorithms can find the global optimal solution as found by Yang et al [47].…”
Section: Pressure Vessel Designmentioning
confidence: 99%