2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11128-020-02930-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

True experimental reconstruction of quantum states and processes via convex optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the MSQPT method, the matrix is Hermitian by construction, however there is no guarantee that it will satisfy the last two conditions. One can use the constrained convex optimization (CCO) technique 10 to obtain a valid matrix from as follows: where is the experimentally obtained process matrix using the MSQPT protocol and is the variable process matrix which represents the underlying true quantum process.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the MSQPT method, the matrix is Hermitian by construction, however there is no guarantee that it will satisfy the last two conditions. One can use the constrained convex optimization (CCO) technique 10 to obtain a valid matrix from as follows: where is the experimentally obtained process matrix using the MSQPT protocol and is the variable process matrix which represents the underlying true quantum process.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resource requirements for standard QST and QPT methods grow exponentially with increasing system size, and hence several novel methods have been designed that focus on simplifying and reducing experimental complexity such as maximum likelihood estimation 3 , adaptive quantum tomography 4 , self-guided tomography 5 , ancilla-assisted tomography 6 , compressed sensing tomography 7 , 8 , and least square optimization based tomography 9 , 10 . These novel tomography protocols have been experimentally demonstrated on various physical configurations such as NMR 11 , 12 , linear-optics 13 , NV-centers 14 , ion-trap based quantum processors 15 , photonic qubits 16 , and superconducting qubits 17 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density matrix of the initial state was reconstructed using least square constrained convex optimization method [48] by performing full quantum state tomography using a set of seven preparatory pulses {III, XXX, IIY , XY X, Y II, XXY , IY Y } where I represents 'no-operation' and X(Y ) is the local π/2 unitary operator with phases x(y) and local operations The quantum circuit to implement PT-symmetric Hamiltonian is shown in Fig. 1(a).…”
Section: Experimental Demonstration Of the Dynamics Of Quantum Cohere...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note here that using the standard QPT method may not always lead to a positive semi-definite experimentally constructed χ matrix, due to experimental uncertainties. This problem can be resolved by reformulating the linear inversion problem as a constrained convex optimization problem as follows [19]:…”
Section: A Standard Qpt and χ Matrix Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several QST protocols have been extended to perform QPT, which include MLE-based QPT [9], LS-based QPT [10], simplified QPT [11], convex optimization-based QPT [12], selective and efficient QPT [13], adaptive QPT [14], and ancillaassisted QPT [15]. These protocols have been successfully demonstrated on various physical systems such as NMR [16][17][18][19][20], NV-centers [21], linear optics [22], superconducting qubits [23][24][25] and ion trap-based quantum processors [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%