2009
DOI: 10.1080/10508420802487096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

True Confessions?: Alumni's Retrospective Reports on Undergraduate Cheating Behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[12] Another study raised an alarm when 81.7% of college alumni admitted to academic misconduct during their college years in the USA. [13] The present study also indicates that almost all of the medical student participants in the UAE were involved in at least one act of academic dishonesty, the most common ones being giving the proxy for attendance, getting technical help during exams and copying during exams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Another study raised an alarm when 81.7% of college alumni admitted to academic misconduct during their college years in the USA. [13] The present study also indicates that almost all of the medical student participants in the UAE were involved in at least one act of academic dishonesty, the most common ones being giving the proxy for attendance, getting technical help during exams and copying during exams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, academic cheating shows some similarities with academic procrastination as both are more frequently observed in males than in females and in impulsive students who strongly disagree with academic rules (Anderman, Cupp, & Lane, 2009;Brunell, Staats, Barden, & Hupp, 2011;Karim, Zamzuri, & Nor, 2009;Miller, Murdock, Anderman, & Poindexter, 2007). Moreover, students who tend to plagiarise and cheat get lower grades, show a lower level of conscientiousness and self efficacy and attend lessons less frequently than honest students (Yardley, Domènech, Bates, & Nelson, 2009), characteristics which are also described as usual for procrastinators (Ackerman & Gross, 2005;Clariana et al, 2011;Klassen et al, 2009).…”
Section: Academic Cheatingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They have cited extenuating circumstances, such as high workloads, unreasonable faculties demands, and time pressures that induce them to engage in academic dishonesty [14] . Students have been expected to master increasingly difficult subject matter as the volume and complexity of nursing knowledge increases [1,10,11,15,16] . McCabe [8] reported that students in accelerated programs were more likely to engage in cheating, and suggested this may be due to increased time pressure or decreased time for socialization into the profession.…”
Section: Factors That Influence Academic Dishonesty Among Nursing Stumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O'Rourke et al [14] reported that students justified cheating by charging that peers who cheat gain unfair advantage. Students who believe that they must succeed may see academic dishonesty as crucial to achieving their goals [15,16] . Nursing students have reported sabotaging peers in an effort to remain competitive [9] .…”
Section: Factors That Influence Academic Dishonesty Among Nursing Stumentioning
confidence: 99%