2003
DOI: 10.1080/10635150309323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

True and False Gharials: A Nuclear Gene Phylogeny of Crocodylia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The disagreement between the morphological and the molecular results can, however, in essence be reduced to the placement of the root of the crocodilian tree. Morphological data have in general placed it on Gavialis (Norell 1989;Brochu 1997;Poe 1996), while the mitogenomic analysis and other molecular data (Densmore 1983;Gatesy et al 1993Gatesy et al , 2003Hass et al 1992;Harshman et al 2003) place it on the branch that separates the Alligatoridae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The disagreement between the morphological and the molecular results can, however, in essence be reduced to the placement of the root of the crocodilian tree. Morphological data have in general placed it on Gavialis (Norell 1989;Brochu 1997;Poe 1996), while the mitogenomic analysis and other molecular data (Densmore 1983;Gatesy et al 1993Gatesy et al , 2003Hass et al 1992;Harshman et al 2003) place it on the branch that separates the Alligatoridae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Harshman et al (2003) was based on a part of the cmyc nuclear gene, while that by Gatesy et al (2003) used a combination of the RAG-1 nuclear sequence plus about 800 nt from portions of the mt 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, and cytochrome b genes. The nuclear sequences joined Gavialis and Tomistoma but the position of the branch was not conclusively settled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the traditional view is that the root lies between paleognath and neognath clades (12,27,46), early analyses of mtDNA placed the root either between passerines and all other birds (47) or within passerines (48,49), contradicting neognath monophyly. More sophisticated analyses (e.g., RY-coding) of mtDNA data strongly support the traditional rooting (22,23,50,51), unlike the early analyses.…”
Section: Monophyly Of Australasian Ratites Placement Of Tinamous Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assembled a dataset of 20 nuclear loci widely dispersed in the avian genome [supporting information (SI) Table S1] to examine ratite monophyly. It contains Ϸ30% protein-coding and 70% noncoding sequence (Table S1), taking advantage of the phylogenetic signal in archosaur noncoding sequences (26)(27)(28). The dataset comprises 18 taxa, including all extant ratite genera, four tinamou genera, and eight outgroup taxa (Table S2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The c-myc gene mutations resulted in the reduced individual size, and tumor [23] had already been proved to occur in animals. Recently, the c-myc gene was used to infer phylogeny in mammals [24] , avians [25] , crocodiles [26] , and frogs [27] , and served as a useful molecular marker to investigate the higher-level phylogenies such as order and family. However, as far as we know, phylogenetic studies of fishes based on the c-myc gene have not been available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%