“…Overall, it is imperative for health experts to understand that vaccine hesitants’ cost-analysis of vaccination adoption may be drastically different, and perhaps most importantly, may not be accurately grounded in evidence ( The Associated Press-, 2020 ; roup and A future v, 2020 ), where even though a vaccine could save lives, livelihoods, and GDPs ( Yamey et al., 2020 ; Lurie et al., 2020 ; Thanh Le et al., 2020 ; Graham, 2020 ), an extremely low probability of vaccine-related adverse effect may hinder their adoption behaviours ( Opri et al., 2018 ). For people who have egg allergies or those who perceive they may have a hypersensitive reactions to vaccines without any clinical foundations ( Opri et al., 2018 ), regardless of whether a COVID-19 vaccine contains egg proteins, how soon it becomes available, or how safe and effective it may be, they may still be reluctant to adopt the vaccine because the perceived personal health-related risks (i.e., an allergic reaction) outweigh the proposed potential benefits (i.e., protection from the virus). Thus, it is important for health experts to communicate safety measures in an informative as well as persuasive manner ( Noar et al., 2009 ), in order to effectively clear these vaccine hesitants’ unjustified doubts.…”