2019
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

True 99th centile of high sensitivity cardiac troponin for hospital patients: prospective, observational cohort study

Abstract: ObjectiveTo determine the distribution, and specifically the true 99th centile, of high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) for a whole hospital population by applying the hs-cTnI assay currently used routinely at a large teaching hospital.DesignProspective, observational cohort study.SettingUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom, between 29 June 2017 and 24 August 2017.Participants20 000 consecutive inpatients and outpatients undergoing blood tests for any clini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, NICE guidance anticipated that implementation would lead to markedly reduced admissions, which is not yet obvious from routinely available data. It has been suggested elsewhere6 that high-sensitivity troponins could lead to overdiagnosis and overinvestigation. Further research could explore whether implementation of high-sensitivity troponin testing at different times across different Trusts over the last decade is associated with an effect on admissions with chest pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, NICE guidance anticipated that implementation would lead to markedly reduced admissions, which is not yet obvious from routinely available data. It has been suggested elsewhere6 that high-sensitivity troponins could lead to overdiagnosis and overinvestigation. Further research could explore whether implementation of high-sensitivity troponin testing at different times across different Trusts over the last decade is associated with an effect on admissions with chest pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 There is, however, evidence that both standard cTn and, to a greater degree, cs-cTn are frequently The CHARIOT-ED substudy detected in patients presenting to ED, despite only a small proportion having a T1MI. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] In the CHARIOT study, we measured cs-cTn on 20,000 consecutive patients attending our institution for any reason, either inpatient or outpatient, with the aim of describing the true distribution and 99th percentile for cs-cTn in a hospital population. 16 In the current study, we report the distribution of cs-cTn in the subpopulation of CHARIOT who attended ED and in whom the assay was taken regardless of whether there was a clinical indication, and we assess a possible association between the cs-cTn concentration and both 30-day mortality and length of stay.…”
Section: In Patients Whose Cs-ctni Test Was Requested Solely As Part mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A point-counterpoint set of editorials in this issue of Heart debates the role of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) measurements in clinical practice 10 11. Collinson et al 10 discuss their concerns with the troponin measurements in the CHARIOT (Current Threshold for Diagnosis of ‘Abnormality’, Including Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Using Raised Highly Sensitive Troponin Appropriate for a Hospital Population) study 12. They emphasise that: ‘It is important to remember that hs-cTn assays are extremely sensitive for myocardial injury, and that myocardial injury does not always (in fact most often), does not equate acute myocardial infarction (MI).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%