2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.17.996033
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TRTools: a toolkit for genome-wide analysis of tandem repeats

Abstract: A rich set of tools have recently been developed for performing genomewide genotyping of tandem repeats (TRs). However, standardized tools for downstream analysis of these results are lacking. To facilitate TR analysis applications, we present TRTools, a Python library and a suite of command-line tools for filtering, merging, and quality control of TR genotype files. TRTools utilizes an internal harmonization module making it compatible with outputs from a wide range of TR genotypers.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Short tandem repeats (STRs) were called from aligned WGS data with GangSTR v.2.4 (42), using the GangSTR hg19 reference file v.13.1. The calls were filtered and analyzed using three tools from the STR analysis toolkit TRTools (43). First, dumpSTR was used to filter for quality of calls using the following parameters: read depth >20, read depth <1000, QUAL >0.9, spanbound only (calls that are spanned by reads), and filter bad confidence intervals (filtered calls whose maximum likelihood estimates were not within the confidence interval).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short tandem repeats (STRs) were called from aligned WGS data with GangSTR v.2.4 (42), using the GangSTR hg19 reference file v.13.1. The calls were filtered and analyzed using three tools from the STR analysis toolkit TRTools (43). First, dumpSTR was used to filter for quality of calls using the following parameters: read depth >20, read depth <1000, QUAL >0.9, spanbound only (calls that are spanned by reads), and filter bad confidence intervals (filtered calls whose maximum likelihood estimates were not within the confidence interval).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%