Trouwen

Scheltema, T. W. L.; Walschap, Gerard

doi:10.2307/40118071

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The English-speaking reception of the Bibliotheca Neerlandica which advertised the series was mixed, with some criticising the author's style such as Bergonzi (1965) and others such as in The Times Literary Supplement (1965) criticising the translator. Scheltema (1963) and The Manchester Guardian (1964) were both positive towards the author Walschap, as was The Times Literary Supplement (1993) towards Vestdijk. Jonkheere (1966) went so far as to question whether The Man in the Mirror (1963) would be out of fashion for an English speaking audience.…”

Section: Review Date Publicationmentioning

confidence: 98%

Exporting the Canon: The Mixed Experience of the Dutch Bibliotheca Neerlandica

Wolters¹

2020

Translating the Literatures of Small European Nations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter presents an archive-based case study of the Bibliotheca Neerlandica, a project launched in 1955 by the newly established Foundation for the Promotion of the Translation of Dutch Literary Works, which aimed to publish commercial English translations of seventeen volumes of Dutch literature, but ended abruptly in 1969 with the publication of the tenth. Through analysis of the underlying aims, the prevailing culture of literary translation, the choices of text and the notion of a ‘Dutch canon’, the structure and management of the commissioning body and the relationship with the publisher, Heinemann, the chapter provides a nuanced cautionary tale about the use of imaginative literature for cultural diplomacy. The chapter documents the breakdown of the project’s relationship with Heinemann, prompted not only by the publisher’s major commercial difficulties in the period, but also by the quality of the translations, which regularly needed review, revision and correction, and the unsuitability of the texts chosen. It highlights the negative reception of those volumes that were reviewed, which found in the texts precisely the claustrophobic provincialism that the series had been conceived to overcome.

show abstract

Section: Review Date Publicationmentioning

confidence: 98%