2020
DOI: 10.3102/0013189x20963582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Troubling the Essentialist Discourse ofBrownin Education: The Anti-Black Sociopolitical and Sociohistorical Etymology of Latinxs as aBrownMonolith

Abstract: US-based scholars often colloquially employ Brown as a monolithic reference to Latinidad in education research without attention to its racialized and anti-Black underpinnings. In this conceptual essay, we apprehend the currents of hemispheric racial formation within a South–North orientation to problematize the essentialist ethos of US Latinxs as monolithically Brown. To do so, we briefly trace the anti-Black sociohistorical and sociopolitical etymology of a uniform Brown Latinx identity as a byproduct of col… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings suggest that the ambiguous nature of the Hispanic category allows not only organizations to meet institutional goals of serving Hispanic-identifying students (Mora 2014), but also provides applicants with latitude in defining their ethnic identity. These findings contribute to the burgeoning discourse on how university depictions of ethnoracial diversity are often augmented by creative quantification and categorization strategies, as well as unclear racial and ethnic boundaries (Byrd 2021;Busey & Silva, 2021;Ford and Patterson 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Our findings suggest that the ambiguous nature of the Hispanic category allows not only organizations to meet institutional goals of serving Hispanic-identifying students (Mora 2014), but also provides applicants with latitude in defining their ethnic identity. These findings contribute to the burgeoning discourse on how university depictions of ethnoracial diversity are often augmented by creative quantification and categorization strategies, as well as unclear racial and ethnic boundaries (Byrd 2021;Busey & Silva, 2021;Ford and Patterson 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Following a preliminary review, a sentence-by-sentence analysis considered terms, phrases, and components with multiple or hidden meanings. Coupled with an explicit consideration of race (Busey & Silva, 2021), the coding followed in-vivo coding to identify salient phrases related to campus racial equity (Saldaña, 2021). This analysis was enhanced by the use of memoing and reflection to address the potential bias and increase the study's trustworthiness of the analysis (Creswell & Poth, 2016; Merriam & Tisdell, 2015).…”
Section: Data Collection Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research utilized CRDA; informed by prior analyzes, which drew together CRT within CDA (Busey & Silva, 2021;Casellas Connors, 2021). First, the quantitative textual analysis addressed the features and contours of the data.…”
Section: Analysis Framework: Textual Analysis and Critical Race Disco...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These shifts have captured how "the term 'diversity' is used in multiple contexts serving myriad functions" (Harris et al, 2015, p. 24). Narratives considering Latinx students have taken up a discourse of "browning," which serves to distance Latinidad from Blackness (Busey & Silva, 2020), informed by the political tax associated with explicitly racialized discourse. Capturing how racial policy discourse draws a largely negative response shaped by White individuals perceptions that discussions of race run counter to egalitarian values (Huber & Lapinski, 2006;Mendelberg, 2017).…”
Section: Evolution Of Racial Diversity and Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%