Passive samplers (diffusion tubes with organic reagent, produced by Passam of Switzerland) were used in a sampling campaign for the detection of weekly mean ozone concentrations in 15 sites over a domain of 80 × × × × 40 km on the southern side of the European Alps from May to August 1998. The area is characterized by vast natural terrain of complex topography, with conifer and broadleaf forests. It is difficult to access and monitor air quality there with continuous analysers. By applying geostatistical techniques (ordinary kriging), and correcting the interpolated ozone concentrations according to the altitude of each single grid cell (2 × × × × 2 km), maps of weekly ozone concentrations were produced. The weekly ozone data were used to assess daily and hourly data by means of an iterative procedure based on a functional dependence of ozone concentrations both on altitude and on the time of day. This allowed the estimation of values with an exposure index such as AOT40 (accumulated exposure over the threshold of 40 ppb) in all 800 cells of the domain. This also allowed the mapping of risk assessment related to the effects of ozone on the regional forest vegetation. Results obtained show values that exceed the exposure standards adopted in the Kuopio protocol (1996). Excess exposure values also match values calculated over a wider territorial domain by using hourly data on ozone concentration derived from continuous automatic analysers.KEY WORDS: ozone, risk assessment, Alps, forests, passive samplers, exposure indices, AOT40, geostatistics DOMAINS: atmospheric systems, ecosystems and communities, environmental toxicology, environmental technology, environmental management and policy, ecosystems management, environmental monitoring, environmental modelling, information management Mazzali et al.: Ozone Risk Assessment by Passive Sampling TheScientificWorldJOURNAL (2002) 2, 1023-1035
1024
INTRODUCTIONThe growing stress of high ozone levels in alpine forest ecosystems faces us with the need to perform risk assessment for specific receptors to allow for the protection of the ecological, economic, and aesthetic values of vegetation. During the assessment of dose-response relationship of vegetation to ozone exposure, investigators concentrated on the use of indices to quantify the exposure. Several studies have dealt with both definition and assessment of these indices, taking into account the most harmful pollution levels for vegetation [1,2]. The most frequently used exposure indices attribute different weights to high and low ozone concentrations; these indices include SUM x (sum of the hourly concentrations beyond the x threshold), AOT x (sum of the differences between hourly concentrations and the x threshold), W y (sum of the hourly concentrations weighted by means of sigma functions indicated by the value of y), and AL y (sum of the hourly concentrations weighted by means of allometric functions indicated by the value of y) [3].According to some indices, literature supplies potential damage thresholds (crit...