2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Troponin-positive, MB-negative patients with non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction: An undertreated but high-risk patient group: Results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network–Get With The Guidelines (NCDR ACTION-GWTG) Registry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these recommendations, our study shows that the biomarker, particularly troponin level was not routinely measured for patients with AMI in many hospitals with testing capability in 2011. This may hinder diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with NSTEMI, for example, troponin-positive and CK-MB-negative patients have a higher risk profile but are less likely to receive guideline-recommended acute pharmacologic treatment because of the oversight of clinically meaningful early biomarker abnormalities [ 29 ]. Our study suggests that doctors were not selectively avoiding use of biomarker testing according to whether patients presented as STEMI or NSTEMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these recommendations, our study shows that the biomarker, particularly troponin level was not routinely measured for patients with AMI in many hospitals with testing capability in 2011. This may hinder diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with NSTEMI, for example, troponin-positive and CK-MB-negative patients have a higher risk profile but are less likely to receive guideline-recommended acute pharmacologic treatment because of the oversight of clinically meaningful early biomarker abnormalities [ 29 ]. Our study suggests that doctors were not selectively avoiding use of biomarker testing according to whether patients presented as STEMI or NSTEMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The male/female difference noted for a POC assay (Siemens CS) has not been previously reported in the literature. The lack of sex-defined cutoffs may explain why women have fewer increases in cardiac troponin and may be why women in some studies appear to have different clinical outcomes when they present with acute coronary syndrome (30 ). We strongly advocate for separate 99th percentile values based on sex, regardless of the assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is evidence that the additional individuals diagnosed by a positive troponin test (ie, those who are troponin positive by creatine kinase–MB negative) actually have a higher risk profile than those who are creatine kinase–MB positive. 41 Furthermore, during this period, the number of AMI hospitalizations actually decreased. 3 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%