2001
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m011070200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tropomyosin-Troponin Regulation of Actin Does Not Involve Subdomain 2 Motions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutant A144C/C374A was chosen to test for the binding of DrABD to actin's hydrophobic cleft between subdomains 1 and 3, which is known to interact with several actin-binding proteins. All yeast actin mutants employed in this study show normal polymerization properties (20; 21). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutant A144C/C374A was chosen to test for the binding of DrABD to actin's hydrophobic cleft between subdomains 1 and 3, which is known to interact with several actin-binding proteins. All yeast actin mutants employed in this study show normal polymerization properties (20; 21). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-ray diffraction patterns of oriented F-actin gels revealed a small radial shift of loop 38 -52 on Tm binding to actin (32), and possible contribution of subdomain 2 movements within actin protomers to changes in x-ray diffraction patterns from muscle in response to Ca 2ϩ activation of thin filament has been discussed (33). On the other hand, fluorescence studies on both muscle actin and yeast actin mutants with probes on residues 41 or 51 indicated that transitions among the blocked, closed, and open regulatory states involve no significant subdomain 2 movement (34). A most recent study of effects of the regulatory proteins on the affinity for myosin S1 and in vitro motility of subtilisin-cleaved actin has also led to the conclusion that subdomain 2 conformation does not play an active role in the regulation of actomyosin interactions (35).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to the closed state position (16). This regulation model does not evoke any companion dynamic changes on actin and, therefore, is not in conflict with the apparent absence of subdomain 2 motions during actin regulation (17).…”
Section: Fig 2 S1⅐adp Binding To Uncleaved and Cleaved Actins With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar conclusion was reached in an electron microscopic study of thin filaments containing mutant tropomyosin, in which troponin density was found near Met 47 (although troponin more strongly contacted subdomain 1 than subdomain 2) (7). Although previous work from our laboratory (17) did not detect any subdomain 2 movements during regulation, all of our experiments used probes attached to Gln 41 (in ␣-skeletal actin) or Cys 41 and Cys 51 (in mutant yeast actins). Because such probes may have altered the dynamics, if not the conformation, of an intrinsically dynamic subdomain 2, and because TnI cross-links to Met 47 on actin, we tested for Tm/Tn interactions with this region using subtilisin-cleaved actin (3,18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%