2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2016.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tropomyosin-binding properties modulate competition between tropomodulin isoforms

Abstract: The formation and fine-tuning of cytoskeleton in cells are governed by proteins that influence actin filament dynamics. Tropomodulin (Tmod) regulates the length of actin filaments by capping the pointed ends in a tropomyosin (TM)-dependent manner. Tmod1, Tmod2 and Tmod3 are associated with the cytoskeleton of non-muscle cells and their expression has distinct consequences on cell morphology. To understand the molecular basis of differences in the function and localization of Tmod isoforms in a cell, we compare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tmod2’s LRR domain has a structure similar to Tmod1, but was less resistant to denaturation by urea and more susceptible to protease degradation (Guillaud et al, 2014). The difference in stability of Tmod1’s and Tmod2’s LRR domains may be explained by difference in the orientation of the C-terminal α-helix, which is crucial for the LRR domain’s ability to bind actin (Colpan et al, 2016; Kostyukova and Hitchcock-DeGregori, 2004). These differences may contribute to the difference in affinity for actin monomers.…”
Section: Tropomodulins and Tropomyosins – Discovery Structure And Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Tmod2’s LRR domain has a structure similar to Tmod1, but was less resistant to denaturation by urea and more susceptible to protease degradation (Guillaud et al, 2014). The difference in stability of Tmod1’s and Tmod2’s LRR domains may be explained by difference in the orientation of the C-terminal α-helix, which is crucial for the LRR domain’s ability to bind actin (Colpan et al, 2016; Kostyukova and Hitchcock-DeGregori, 2004). These differences may contribute to the difference in affinity for actin monomers.…”
Section: Tropomodulins and Tropomyosins – Discovery Structure And Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disruption of Tpm’s coiled coil near the N-terminus by either mutagenesis or removing the acetyl group from the 1a exon of Tpms reduces actin binding (Moraczewska et al, 2000) and Tmod binding (Greenfield and Fowler, 2002). This is especially important for HMW Tpms; however, Tmods can effectively cap actin filaments decorated with LMW non-acetylated Tpms (Colpan et al, 2016; Kostyukova and Hitchcock-DeGregori, 2004; Kostyukova et al, 2007). Inhibition of the N-terminal acetyltransferase B complex (NatB), which acetylates Tpms, causes loss of actin stress fibers (Van Damme et al, 2012).…”
Section: Tropomodulins and Tropomyosins – Discovery Structure And Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations