1997
DOI: 10.4065/72.6.495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tropicamide Eyedrops Cannot Be Used for Reliable Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the literature regarding the visual changes in AD is controversial, with different studies often giving conflicting results. In addition, optometrists should not use the 0.01% tropicamide test as a test for AD, as recent studies 57,58 have not confirmed earlier reports. 53 However, it is important that optometrists continue to use the regular dosage of tropicamide (1%) for papillary dilation and ocular health examination.…”
Section: In the Identification Of Admentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the literature regarding the visual changes in AD is controversial, with different studies often giving conflicting results. In addition, optometrists should not use the 0.01% tropicamide test as a test for AD, as recent studies 57,58 have not confirmed earlier reports. 53 However, it is important that optometrists continue to use the regular dosage of tropicamide (1%) for papillary dilation and ocular health examination.…”
Section: In the Identification Of Admentioning
confidence: 90%
“…55 Hence, use of the tropicamide response cannot be recommended as a clinical application to detect AD. 57,58 Enhanced pupillary responses in AD have also been reported following the application of dilute solutions of phenylephrine (a sympathetic agonist) and of pilocarpine (a cholinergic agonist). 59 Reductions in the pupillary light reflex have also been reported in AD, although these responses are highly variable.…”
Section: Pupillary Functionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following the publication of the original report of pupillary sensitivity in patients with a diagnosis of probable AD, some 27 publications have appeared evaluating the use of the pupil assay as an early biomarker for AD. These reports Buque et al 1997;Feiler et al 1996;Ferrario et al 1998;FitzSimon et al 1997;Fridh et al 1996;Gomes-Tortosa et al 1996;Graff-Radford et al 1997;Growdon et al 1997;Higuchi et al 1997a;Imamura et al 1996;Kalman et al 1997;Kaneyuki et al 1998;Kono et al 1996;Kurz et al 1997;Leszek et al 1996;Litvan & FitzGibbon 1996;Loupe et al 1996;Marx et al 1995;Matsushita et al 1996;Nuzzi et al 1996;Reitner et al 1997;Robles et al 1996, Schweitzer et al 1996Tourino et al 1997;Treloar et al 1996;Woodruf-Pak et al 1996) confirmed, with rare exceptions, that patients with a diagnosis of probable AD exhibited an exaggerated response to tropicamide. However, a number of these studies had shown varying degrees of overlap in the response of AD patients and community dwelling elder controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In 1994, Scinto et al reported that AD patients had hypersensitivity of the pupil dilation after diluted tropicamide instillation [282]. Since the publication of this work, numerous studies have been performed, with several results showing both negative [283][284][285][286][287][288][289][290][291] and positive results [281,282,[292][293][294][295][296][297]. Some of these studies point to a lack of specificity to the pupil tropicamide test in AD [288,298].…”
Section: Pupillary Response To Lightmentioning
confidence: 90%