The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tropical legume supplementation influences microbial protein synthesis and rumen ecology

Abstract: Four rumen-fistulated male swamp buffaloes, 5-year-old with initiated live weight at 360 ± 12 kg, were randomly assigned according to a 4 × 4 Latin square design to investigate the effect of feeding high level of dried Leucaena leaf (DLL) on feed intake, fermentation efficiency and microbial protein synthesis. The dietary treatments were the feeding levels of DLL at 0, 2, 4 and 6 kg/head/day. All buffaloes were supplemented with concentrate mixtures at 0.1% of body weight, and rice straw was fed ad libitum wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

9
10
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
9
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatments 1 and 2 showed a higher BUN compared to treatment 0. In accordance with these results in another study, doses of 0.83% and 1.89% CT increased BUN compared to the control treatment [47]. By contrast, a reduction of BUN at doses below 1.9% CT has been also reported [42], which compares well with the reduction in BUN observed at the dose of 1.2% CT in this trial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Treatments 1 and 2 showed a higher BUN compared to treatment 0. In accordance with these results in another study, doses of 0.83% and 1.89% CT increased BUN compared to the control treatment [47]. By contrast, a reduction of BUN at doses below 1.9% CT has been also reported [42], which compares well with the reduction in BUN observed at the dose of 1.2% CT in this trial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the present study rumen pH values did not vary significantly (on average 6.5 ± 0.05) among treatments. Similar results have been reported elsewhere, with average pH values of 6.6 ± 0.2 at CT concentrations of <2% [40][41][42]47]. This result could be explained by the proportion of forage in the rations of the above mentioned studies, which was kept at above >50% of DM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations