2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2015.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tropical forest degradation and recovery in fragmented landscapes — Simulating changes in tree community, forest hydrology and carbon balance

Abstract: a b s t r a c tEmpirical studies on severely fragmented regions suggest that decades after fragmentation, forest edges located near human-modified areas exhibit the structure of early successional states, with lower biomass per area and higher mortality compared to non-edge areas. These habitat changes (edge effects) can also have a considerable impact on ecosystem processes such as carbon and water balance, which in turn have a major impact on human activities.Using field data from a long-term fragmented land… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In anthropogenic landscapes surrounded by a harsh matrix, we assume that there is a sharp decrease in biomass in the first years after forest fragmentation, due to the mortality of large shade‐tolerant trees (Figure e). The duration of this biomass‐decay period is context dependent (Figures , e), and it could range between 4 and 80 years (Dantas de Paula, Groeneveld, & Huth, ; Laurance et al., ; Pütz et al., ). After the stabilization of shade‐tolerant species mortality, biomass can be increased by the proliferation of pioneers and lianas, but insufficiently to compensate for the period of sharp biomass decrease (Figure e).…”
Section: Landscape‐level Effects On Biomass Loss—a Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In anthropogenic landscapes surrounded by a harsh matrix, we assume that there is a sharp decrease in biomass in the first years after forest fragmentation, due to the mortality of large shade‐tolerant trees (Figure e). The duration of this biomass‐decay period is context dependent (Figures , e), and it could range between 4 and 80 years (Dantas de Paula, Groeneveld, & Huth, ; Laurance et al., ; Pütz et al., ). After the stabilization of shade‐tolerant species mortality, biomass can be increased by the proliferation of pioneers and lianas, but insufficiently to compensate for the period of sharp biomass decrease (Figure e).…”
Section: Landscape‐level Effects On Biomass Loss—a Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration of this biomass-decay period is context dependent (Figures 1, 2e), and it could range between 4 and 80 years (Dantas de Paula, Groeneveld, & Huth, 2015;Laurance et al, 1997;P€ utz et al, 2014). After the stabilization of shade-tolerant species mortality, biomass can be increased by the proliferation of pioneers and lianas, but insufficiently to compensate for the period of sharp biomass decrease (Figure 2e).…”
Section: Temporal Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these knowledge gaps forest models are a useful tool to upscale local empirical observations (Fischer et al 2016). One of these forest models, FORMIND, has a 20 year long history of successful representation of forest dynamics (Fischer et al 2016) also under several disturbance scenarios including logging (Huth andDitzer 2001, Huth et al 2004), climate change (Fischer et al 2014, Hiltner et al 2016, landslides (Dislich and Huth 2012), and fragmentation (Groeneveld et al 2009, Pütz et al 2011, Dantas de Paula et al 2015. With regards to defaunation, two recent studies using statistical models have related defaunation to biomass loss in fragmented forests, by substituting large seeded trees for others from the community, and estimating future carbon stocks (Bello et al 2015, Peres et al 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The declaration of PAs has increased globally because of increased environmental sensitivity [1]; to counter the threats of climate change [2]; land use changes [3]; deforestation [4]; the risk of flooding [5]; the risk of forest fires [6]; habitat fragmentation [7]; the propagation of invasive species [8]; urban pressure [9]; and recreational use [10]. based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%