2012
DOI: 10.1002/qj.2064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tropical cyclone predictions over the Bay of Bengal using the high‐resolution Advanced Research Weather Research and Forecasting (ARW) model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, 2), many studies (e.g., Oouchi et al 2006;Murakami et al 2012;Srinivas et al 2013;Strachan et al 2013) showed the importance of using high-resolution models to capture the observed intensities and tracks of intense TCs. One might argue that the low-resolution simulation results presented in the previous section are less robust on the grounds that the basic structures around the typhoon center, such as the eye wall, are not well reproduced.…”
Section: Results From Nesting Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, 2), many studies (e.g., Oouchi et al 2006;Murakami et al 2012;Srinivas et al 2013;Strachan et al 2013) showed the importance of using high-resolution models to capture the observed intensities and tracks of intense TCs. One might argue that the low-resolution simulation results presented in the previous section are less robust on the grounds that the basic structures around the typhoon center, such as the eye wall, are not well reproduced.…”
Section: Results From Nesting Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model has several options for spatial discretization, diffusion, nesting, lateral boundary conditions, data assimilation and physics (Skamarock et al, 2008). The ARW for tropical cyclone prediction over the NIO region was customized by simulating 21 past cyclones (Srinivas et al, 2013a) with two nested domains and with physics sensitivity tests. The same domain and physics configuration is adopted for TC predictions over BOB in the present study.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean forecast errors for operational IMD QLM have been reported as 152, 235 and 375 km for 24, 48 and 72 h forecasts respectively (Prasad and Rama Rao, 2006;Tyagi et al, 2010;Rama Rao et al, 2010). Srinivas et al (2013a) assessed the performance of the ARW model for 21 cases of cyclones that formed between 2000 and 2011 with a horizontal resolution (27, 9 km) similar to operational configuration of IMD WRF and NCEP HWRF for TC predictions over Bay of Bengal (BOB). The mean forecast errors were reported as −2-15 hPa for central sea level pressure (CSLP), 1-22 m s −1 for maximum surface winds (MSW) and 170-250 km for vector track positions corresponding to 24-72 h predictions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The used physics options for this study are KF2 (Kain 2004) for cumulus convection, WSM3 explicit microphysics, Dudhia scheme (Dudhia 1989) for shortwave radiation processes, RRTM scheme for longwave radiation processes (Mlawer et al 1997), the Yonsei University scheme for the PBL turbulence (Hong et al 2006;Nolan et al 2009aNolan et al , 2009b and five layer soil thermal diffusion scheme for land surface processes. As the main objective of the study is to explain the westward movement of the storm, we used the grid resolution, size of the domains, and the physics options chosen for this study are same as the previous studies (Sathi Devi et al 2006;Bhaskar Rao and Hari Prasad 2006a, b;Srinivas et al 2007Srinivas et al , 2013Bhaskarrao et al 2009Bhaskarrao et al , 2010Hari Prasad and Bhaskar rao 2015) to maintain the consistency with the previous studies.…”
Section: Details Of the Model And Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%