2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trophodynamic indicators for an ecosystem approach to fisheries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
81
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A suite of trophodynamic indicators was estimated for both the SB and the NB, and their usefulness in detecting the development of the fisheries and associated ecosystem changes was evaluated by Cury et al (2005), who also analyzed their trends since 1950. The trophic level of the catch as defined by Pauly et al (1998) is the mean of the trophic levels of each group caught by the fisheries weighted by their landed mass.…”
Section: Trophodynamic Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A suite of trophodynamic indicators was estimated for both the SB and the NB, and their usefulness in detecting the development of the fisheries and associated ecosystem changes was evaluated by Cury et al (2005), who also analyzed their trends since 1950. The trophic level of the catch as defined by Pauly et al (1998) is the mean of the trophic levels of each group caught by the fisheries weighted by their landed mass.…”
Section: Trophodynamic Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a consensus has emerged in fishery science to complement the 'single species' approach with an ecosystem approach to fisheries (Walters et al 1997, Cury et al 2005. This modern approach explicitly considers direct and indirect ecological interactions, particularly trophic links between ecosystem components, and allows simulations of the impacts of different fishing activities at the level of whole species assemblages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative method of prey evaluation therefore was required. Biological metrics and indices have been commonly and reliably employed to evaluate ecological data for research (Washington 1984;Krebs 1999;Abrantes et al 2014) and fishery management (Cury et al 2005;Jennings 2005;Samhouri et al 2009;Kaplan and Levin 2009). Therefore, the creation and application of an index was used as the basis for the determination of major prey in this study.…”
Section: Caveats and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%