2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1716825115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trophic redundancy reduces vulnerability to extinction cascades

Abstract: SignificanceInitial species loss can lead to follow-on extinctions because of the interconnectedness of species in ecosystems. The loss of biodiversity through human impact can change the structure of ecological communities, which, models predict, can affect the likelihood of secondary extinctions. Uniquely, we provide an empirical demonstration of this with a plant-insect food web experiment by focusing on a particular secondary extinction mechanism. This mechanistic approach leads to specific, empirically te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(48 reference statements)
3
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generalist consumers can average variability in their resources (akin to the portfolio effect of Tilman et al (1998)) by rapidly responding to resource variability in space and time by shifting away from low-density resources and towards high density resources, impeding that variability from emanating throughout food webs (Valdovinos, Ramos-Jiliberto, Garay-Narváez, Urbani, & Dunne, 2010). This switching ability also increases trophic redundancy, which can prevent secondary extinctions (Borrvall, Ebenman, & Jonsson, 2000; Sanders, Thébault, Kehoe, & Frank van Veen, 2018). If a broad suite of organisms can make rapid, smart foraging responses to environmental change, they may accentuate the stabilizing effect of a single generalist module.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalist consumers can average variability in their resources (akin to the portfolio effect of Tilman et al (1998)) by rapidly responding to resource variability in space and time by shifting away from low-density resources and towards high density resources, impeding that variability from emanating throughout food webs (Valdovinos, Ramos-Jiliberto, Garay-Narváez, Urbani, & Dunne, 2010). This switching ability also increases trophic redundancy, which can prevent secondary extinctions (Borrvall, Ebenman, & Jonsson, 2000; Sanders, Thébault, Kehoe, & Frank van Veen, 2018). If a broad suite of organisms can make rapid, smart foraging responses to environmental change, they may accentuate the stabilizing effect of a single generalist module.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isotopic niche breadth had no significant difference along the mixing period. Some studies have highlighted the importance of niche variation and trophic redundancy for the overall community stability across different ecosystems (Ojwang, Ojuok, Mbabazi, & Kaufman, 2010;Sanders, Thébault, Kehoe, & van Veen, 2018;Schwartz-Narbonne et al, 2019). Therefore, the highly conserved niche with low level of trophic redundancy (high MNND values) in the mixing period can enhance ecosystem resilience from the stratification periods.…”
Section: Body Size and Trophic Structure Variations Of Zooplankton mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aspect of stability, often described as "robustness," is important both from the perspective of managing anthropogenic change and in terms of understanding the fundamental stability of ecological communities. Since empirically testing how whole communities respond to extinctions can be difficult or impossible (although see Sanders, Thébault, Kehoe, and Frank van Veen (2018)), a number of studies have attempted to determine the properties that make ecological communities robust through simulation (Dunne & Williams, 2009;Säterberg, Sellman, & Ebenman, 2013). However, incorporating the acknowledged flexibility of ecological networks is a perennial challenge for such studies (Montoya, Pimm, & Solé, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%