2014
DOI: 10.1038/srep06757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trophic interactions induce spatial self-organization of microbial consortia on rough surfaces

Abstract: The spatial context of microbial interactions common in natural systems is largely absent in traditional pure culture-based microbiology. The understanding of how interdependent microbial communities assemble and coexist in limited spatial domains remains sketchy. A mechanistic model of cell-level interactions among multispecies microbial populations grown on hydrated rough surfaces facilitated systematic evaluation of how trophic dependencies shape spatial self-organization of microbial consortia in complex d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our results demonstrate how trophic dependencies are a determining component of microbial self-organizing processes. In addition to trophic dependencies, we pointed out the roles of cell distribution in space and hydration conditions in controlling self-assembly of mutualistic consortium confirming theoretical predictions12. This is of high relevance in unsaturated soils, where average distances between microbial foci can be high and liquid connectivity relatively low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, our results demonstrate how trophic dependencies are a determining component of microbial self-organizing processes. In addition to trophic dependencies, we pointed out the roles of cell distribution in space and hydration conditions in controlling self-assembly of mutualistic consortium confirming theoretical predictions12. This is of high relevance in unsaturated soils, where average distances between microbial foci can be high and liquid connectivity relatively low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The resulting growth conditions in soil may vary in space and time giving rise to episodic anoxic hotspots where much of the anaerobic microbial processes (e.g., denitrification) take place (Flühler et al ., ; Groffman et al ., ; Eilers et al ., ; Kuzyakov & Blagodatskaya, ). Evidence suggests that even at the aggregate‐scale microbial community structure and self‐organization may vary considerably within an aggregate and along the soil profile (Nunan et al ., ; Wang & Or, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, we consider an idealized soil aggregate as the basic modeling building blocks, where details of microbial self‐organization and community functioning are simplified and parameterized based on results compiled from detailed pore‐scale model (Ebrahimi & Or, , ;). In essence, we have consolidated information from a numerical model that explicitly represents microbial life in soil pore networks considering individual cell activity (e.g., dispersion, nutrient uptake, growth, division, and death) across a range of conditions that we varied systematically (Borer et al, ; Ebrahimi & Or, ; Kim & Or, ; Wang & Or, ). The results were used to derive aggregate microbial functions that are used as inputs into an analytical aggregate model.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%