2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00107-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trophic cascades among wolves, elk and aspen on Yellowstone National Park’s northern range

Abstract: Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) biomass has declined in Yellowstone National Park (YNP) in the past century. We installed permanent belt transects (plots) for long-term monitoring of aspen stands both within and outside of established wolf pack territories on YNP's northern range to determine if reintroduced wolves are influencing elk browsing patterns and aspen regeneration through a trophic cascades interaction. Wolves may have an indirect effect on aspen regeneration by altering elk movements, browsing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
278
4
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(296 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
278
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing numbers of studies in North America are demonstrating that wolves exert a strong top-down force that extends to the plant community (Mclaren & Peterson 1994;Ripple et al 2001). In the absence of wolves, beaver, white-tailed deer and other ungulates become superabundant and begin to alter the composition of plant communities (Alverson et al 1988;McShea et al 1997;Pedersen & Wallis 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing numbers of studies in North America are demonstrating that wolves exert a strong top-down force that extends to the plant community (Mclaren & Peterson 1994;Ripple et al 2001). In the absence of wolves, beaver, white-tailed deer and other ungulates become superabundant and begin to alter the composition of plant communities (Alverson et al 1988;McShea et al 1997;Pedersen & Wallis 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While aspen suckers may continue to emerge within small canopy openings, their proliferation becomes increasingly limited without larger disturbance. Survival of aspen regeneration in conifer-dominated stands is often low due to increasing resource limitations and the well documented impacts of ungulate browsing (Baker et al, 1997;Hessl and Graumlich, 2002;Kay and Bartos, 2000;Ripple et al, 2001). Moreover, reduced aspen cover has resulted in limitations on further asexual reproduction: the fewer healthy trees above ground, the less likely new suckers will emerge either on a continuous basis or in a flush following disturbance (Shepperd et al, 2006).…”
Section: Successional Trends From Aspen To Conifer Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently this term has been applied to aspen in the western US (Campbell and Bartos, 2001;Manley et al, 2000). Ripple et al (2001) traced the trophic interactions of wolves, elk, and aspen survival in Yellowstone National Park emphasizing the critical nature of carnivores in regulating large ungulates that browse on aspen regeneration. Without successful regeneration following large-scale disturbance, future aspen forests, dependent on vegetative suckering to persist, will dwindle on the landscape.…”
Section: Lichens As Indicators Of Community Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the same year, Ripple, an ecologist at Oregon State University in Corvallis, published a key paper 4 on the most famous, and probably the best-studied, example of a terrestrial carnivore structuring an ecosystem: Yellowstone's wolves. The ecosystem offered a natural experiment because the US National Park Service had the park's exterminated wolves (Canis lupus) by 1926 and then reinstated them in the 1990s, after public sentiment and ecological theory had shifted.…”
Section: Predators On Topmentioning
confidence: 99%