2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0315-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trophectoderm DNA fingerprinting by quantitative real-time PCR successfully distinguishes sibling human embryos

Abstract: Purpose To validate a novel and more practical system for trophectoderm DNA fingerprinting which reliably distinguishes sibling embryos from each other. Methods In this prospective and blinded study two-cell and 5-cell samples from commercially available sibling cell lines and excess DNA from trophectoderm biopsies of sibling human blastocysts were evaluated for accurate assignment of relationship using qPCR-based allelic discrimination from 40 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with low allele frequency v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Singleembryo transfer (SET) was strongly recommended, but double-embryo transfer (DET) was also authorized. When DET was performed with embryos from both groups, a fingerprinting analysis was planned to trace the babies or products of conception (35). Fingerprinting consisted of obtaining the DNA of the successfully implanted embryos either from tissue from remains of conception in the case of spontaneous miscarriage or from buccal swabs in the case of live birth when DET had been performed.…”
Section: Embryo Transfer and Clinical Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singleembryo transfer (SET) was strongly recommended, but double-embryo transfer (DET) was also authorized. When DET was performed with embryos from both groups, a fingerprinting analysis was planned to trace the babies or products of conception (35). Fingerprinting consisted of obtaining the DNA of the successfully implanted embryos either from tissue from remains of conception in the case of spontaneous miscarriage or from buccal swabs in the case of live birth when DET had been performed.…”
Section: Embryo Transfer and Clinical Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the additional time and expense of evaluating parental DNA could be avoided with this methodology as also previously reported [15]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, with this study we confirm that parental DNA information is not necessary since discrimination was achieved based on a clear genotypic heterogeneity among samples, without incorporating selection of informative SNPs from parental genotype. Therefore, the additional time and expense of evaluating parental DNA could be avoided with this methodology as also previously reported [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Live birth was defined as the birth of a live infant at R24 weeks of gestation. DNA fingerprinting of the delivered infant was performed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to determine the identity of the embryo that resulted in a live birth (32). Patients who were not pregnant or had a twin live birth were not included in the analysis as differences in gene expression between two sibling embryos with the same clinical outcome would not be informative for embryo selection purposes.…”
Section: Embryo Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%