2005
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trojan Horse estimate of bare nucleus astrophysical S(E)-factor for the $\mathsf{^{6}}$Li(p,α)$^{\mathsf{3}}$He reaction and its astrophysical implications

Abstract: Abstract.The 6 Li(p, α) 3 He bare nucleus cross-section at astrophysical energies has been indirectly measured in the framework of the Trojan-Horse Method, finding an agreement within the experimental errors with the results of data extrapolations from direct methods. This result is thus an independent check of the extrapolation method used until now. The method of measure is recalled and the results are shown with particular attention to the bare cross section value at the Gamow energy. The quoted agreement b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(59 reference statements)
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decades strong efforts were devoted to the development and application of indirect methods in nuclear astrophysics. Among the most used indirect methods, an important role is played by the Trojan Horse Method (THM) which has been applied to several reactions in the past decade [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] at the energies relevant for astrophysics (typically smaller than few hundred keV's), which usually are far below the Coulomb barrier, of the order of MeV's. Many tests have been made to fully explore the potentiality of the method and extend as much as possible its applications: the target/projectile break-up invariance [18], the spectator invariance [19,20] and the possible use of virtual neutron beams [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades strong efforts were devoted to the development and application of indirect methods in nuclear astrophysics. Among the most used indirect methods, an important role is played by the Trojan Horse Method (THM) which has been applied to several reactions in the past decade [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] at the energies relevant for astrophysics (typically smaller than few hundred keV's), which usually are far below the Coulomb barrier, of the order of MeV's. Many tests have been made to fully explore the potentiality of the method and extend as much as possible its applications: the target/projectile break-up invariance [18], the spectator invariance [19,20] and the possible use of virtual neutron beams [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has already been applied several times to reactions of relevance for astrophysics ( [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and references therein). The purpose of the THM is to determine the cross section for the binary reaction (2 particles → 2 particles) A + x → C + c, from the measured cross section for the TH reaction 2 particles → 3 particles A + a → C + c + s in the quasifree (QF) kinematics regime, where the "Trojan Horse" (TH) particle, a = (x s), has a strong (s x) cluster structure.…”
Section: The Trojan Horse Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the NACRE compilation, the low-energy part of the S(E) factor is described via the extrapolation made by Kwon et al (1989). A more recent evaluation of the 6 Li(p, α) 3 He reaction rate is provided via the library JINA REACLIB (Cyburt et al 2010) which also refers to the previous TH investigation of Pizzone et al (2005). Thus, in order to upgrade the reaction rate, the low-energy trend of JINA REACLIB has been replaced here by the TH measurement (Equation (4)) in the integration of the S b (E) factor.…”
Section: The Trojan Horse Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the zero energy S(E) factor was S(0) = 3.00 ± 0.19 MeV barns, while the corresponding electron screening potential was 450 ± 100 eV (details can be found in Tumino et al 2003Tumino et al , 2004. The two data sets were then included in the work of Pizzone et al (2005), where this study was devoted to calculating the TH reaction rate using the experimental fit of these two investigations and evaluating its impact during the PMS phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%