Trivariate Theory of Mind Data Analysis with a Conditional Joint Modeling Approach

Jeon, Minjeong; Boeck, Paul De; Li, Xiangrui; Lü, Zhong-Lin

doi:10.1007/s11336-020-09710-9

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Error Variance Of Specific Items1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, there can be important information in the error correlations and related forms of dependence, such as a direct effect of one item response on another. A similar situation occurs when one aspect of an item response (e.g., brain activation) has a direct effect on another (e.g., accuracy; Jeon et al, 2020).…”

Section: Error Variance Of Specific Itemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The trees and the forest: Investigating variability surrounding an aggregate result

Boeck¹,

DeKay

Gore

et al. 2021

Theory & Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We agree with Arocha that the common and exclusive focus on aggregate results of psychological studies creates problems. While a paradigm shift toward idiographic approaches or control theory might help, we argue that traditional approaches can accomplish more if measures of variability are taken seriously. We discuss three kinds of studies: within-person treatment studies, questionnaire-based studies, and replication studies. For each of these, we suggest ways to improve psychological meaningfulness by investigating variability surrounding aggregate results, without ending up in an either–or choice between aggregate results and separate, individual results.

show abstract

Section: Error Variance Of Specific Itemsmentioning

confidence: 99%