2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TRIVAC decision-support model for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of Haemophilus influenzae type b, pneumococcal and rotavirus vaccination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pneumococcal component of TRIVAC (version 2.0) [16] was adapted for Peru to conduct the cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from the perspective of the Government of Peru, including direct costs borne by its public health system-MINSA and the EsSalud Social Security System [17].…”
Section: General Modeling Approach and Comparatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The pneumococcal component of TRIVAC (version 2.0) [16] was adapted for Peru to conduct the cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from the perspective of the Government of Peru, including direct costs borne by its public health system-MINSA and the EsSalud Social Security System [17].…”
Section: General Modeling Approach and Comparatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These outputs were then used to calculate health impact (e.g., DALYs averted), economic impact (e.g., net costs, incremental program costs and treatment costs averted), cost-effectiveness (e.g., cost-per-death averted) and cost-utility (e.g., cost-per-DALY averted). The results from each cohort were combined and used to report both the cumulative and annual health benefits and costs associated with each scenario [16].…”
Section: General Modeling Approach and Comparatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations