1995
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9422(95)00545-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triterpenoidal saponins from Dumasia truncata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preparative reversed-phase HPLC of these fractions eventually yielded sixteen triterpene acids, 1-16 (Chart 1), which were identified as: oleanolic acid (1; ca. 2.7% in the EtOAc-soluble fraction), 21) maslinic acid (2; 1.7%), 9) methyl arjunolate (3; 0.2%), 22,23) 2a,3a,23-trihydroxyolean-12-en-28-oic acid (4; 1.3%), 24) d-oleanolic acid (5; 0.1%), 24,25) ursolic acid (6; 9.7%), 26) methyl ursolate (7; 0.2%), 27) corosolic acid (8; 4.4%), 9) 3-O-cis-p-coumaroyltormentic acid (9; 0.8%), 21) 3-O-trans-p-coumaroyltormentic acid (10; 4.0%), 9) 3-epicorosolic acid (11; 0.2%), 28) euscaphic acid (12; 4.9%), 29) 1b-hydroxyeuscaphic acid (13; 2.9%), 29) usrolic acid lactone (14; 0.1%), 30) betulinic acid (15; 0.1%) 31) and methyl betulinate (16; 0.1%). 32) Identification of the compounds was performed by spectral comparison with the corresponding compounds in the literature.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preparative reversed-phase HPLC of these fractions eventually yielded sixteen triterpene acids, 1-16 (Chart 1), which were identified as: oleanolic acid (1; ca. 2.7% in the EtOAc-soluble fraction), 21) maslinic acid (2; 1.7%), 9) methyl arjunolate (3; 0.2%), 22,23) 2a,3a,23-trihydroxyolean-12-en-28-oic acid (4; 1.3%), 24) d-oleanolic acid (5; 0.1%), 24,25) ursolic acid (6; 9.7%), 26) methyl ursolate (7; 0.2%), 27) corosolic acid (8; 4.4%), 9) 3-O-cis-p-coumaroyltormentic acid (9; 0.8%), 21) 3-O-trans-p-coumaroyltormentic acid (10; 4.0%), 9) 3-epicorosolic acid (11; 0.2%), 28) euscaphic acid (12; 4.9%), 29) 1b-hydroxyeuscaphic acid (13; 2.9%), 29) usrolic acid lactone (14; 0.1%), 30) betulinic acid (15; 0.1%) 31) and methyl betulinate (16; 0.1%). 32) Identification of the compounds was performed by spectral comparison with the corresponding compounds in the literature.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the sugar unit, 6 has a unique sugar chain for cactus plants. There are some reports related to that type of sugar chain [28,[43][44][45][46][47], as it is not a common sugar unit, and this is the first report of its isolation from cacti. Paying attention to glucuronic acid, some compounds (3, 4, 9) were isolated as glucuronic acid methyl esters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…According to the rule (v) mentioned above, it could be easily concluded that there was a glycosidic subtituent at C28 of compound F and there was no glycosidic substituent at C28 of compound K . Based on the retention behavior, compound F was tentatively identified as 3‐ O ‐α‐ L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐ D ‐glucuronopyranosyl‐28‐ O ‐β‐ D ‐glucopyranosyl hederagenin 27 or 3‐ O ‐α‐ L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐β‐ D ‐glucuronopyranosyl‐28‐ O ‐β‐ D ‐glucopyranosyl hederagenin 30, compound K could be tentatively ascribed as 3‐ O ‐α‐ D ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐β‐ D ‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐β‐ D ‐glucuronopyranosyl hederagenin 31.Compound D gave [M+NH 4 ] + , [M+Na] + , and [M+H] + ions at m / z 1106.5782, 1111.5273, and 1089.5436, respectively. The ions at m / z 957.5056 and 927.4892 were observed by loss of 132 and 162 Da from [M+H] + ion, indicating the existence of xylose and glucose at different positions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%