“…The phytochemical study of C. cognatum branches afforded ten TPs ( Figure 1), two presenting ursane skeleton, 3 β ‐acyloxyurs‐12‐ene ( 1 ) and urs‐12‐en‐3 β ‐ol ( α ‐amyrin, 5 ); five of friedelane skeleton, friedelan‐3‐one (friedelin, 2 ), friedelan‐3 β ‐ol ( β ‐friedelinol, 3 ), 28‐hydroxyfriedelan‐3‐one (canophyllol, 8 ), 29‐hydroxyfriedelan‐3‐one ( 9 ) and friedelane‐3 β ,29‐diol ( 10 ); one glutinane, glut‐5‐en‐3 β ‐ol ( 4 ); one oleanane, olean‐12‐en‐3 β ‐ol ( β ‐amyrin, 6 ); and one sterol, β ‐sitosterol ( 7 ). Their chemical structures were confirmed by comparison to previously published 1 H‐ and 13 C‐NMR data ( 1 , [24] 2 , [25] 3 , [26] 4 , [27] 5 , [28] 6 , [29] 7 , [30] 8 , 9 and 10 [21] ) and their spectra are available in the Supporting Information . Previous studies on C. cognatum leaves showed that TPs 9 and 10 represented almost 20 % in weight of the CHCl 3 extract [21] .…”