2022
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2021.3063052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triplet Loss With Multistage Outlier Suppression and Class-Pair Margins for Facial Expression Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where d(i, label) and d(i, i) are the Euclidean distances from candidate indicator i to object label and another indicator i, and ℓ is the minimum distance between these two distances. Empirically speaking, ℓ is usually set to 0.6 [39], and d( * , * ) uses the softmax function to convert its value between 0 and 1. However, this distance is based on the solution of the spatial distance.…”
Section: Feature Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where d(i, label) and d(i, i) are the Euclidean distances from candidate indicator i to object label and another indicator i, and ℓ is the minimum distance between these two distances. Empirically speaking, ℓ is usually set to 0.6 [39], and d( * , * ) uses the softmax function to convert its value between 0 and 1. However, this distance is based on the solution of the spatial distance.…”
Section: Feature Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triplet loss enhances both inter-class compactness and intra-class separability. The authors in [5] developed a classpaired margin identifier mechanism in which the association with an outlier detector improves the performance of FER application. They proposed an outlier detector preventing occluded and confusing samples from having contributions in selected negative samples.…”
Section: A Triplet Loss Sampling Strategies In Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holistic-based methods treat the face as a whole and typically solves occlusion and variant-pose issues based on feature reconstruction of geometry [36] texture [37] or improvement of loss function [12], [38] and synthesis of facial expression [14], [15]. Zhang et al [36] combined the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm and fuzzy C-means to construct a facial point detector and reconstructed 54 facial points of occluded and variant poses.…”
Section: B Computer Vision Fermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [36] combined the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm and fuzzy C-means to construct a facial point detector and reconstructed 54 facial points of occluded and variant poses. Xie et al [12] proposed a new triplet loss based on class-pair margins and multistage outlier suppression to enhance interclass separability and intraclass compactness of network features. Zhang et al [14] performed facial expression recognition and facial image synthesis simultaneously based on a generative adversarial network (GAN) to ease the overfitting problem in the FER task.…”
Section: B Computer Vision Fermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation