2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2016.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triple Pattern Fragments: A low-cost knowledge graph interface for the Web

Abstract: Billions of Linked Data triples exist in thousands of RDF knowledge graphs on the Web, but few of those graphs can be queried live from Web applications. Only a limited number of knowledge graphs are available in a queryable interface, and existing interfaces can be expensive to host at high availability. To mitigate this shortage of live queryable Linked Data, we designed a low-cost Triple Pattern Fragments interface for servers, and a client-side algorithm that evaluates SPARQL queries against this interface… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
265
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
265
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this point we also want to stress that due to the nature of our approach, each result triple can be returned as soon as its decryption has finished. This is in line with the incremental nature of the Triple Pattern Fragment [31] approach, which paginates the query results (typically including 100 results per page), allowing users to ask for further pages if required. For example, decrypting Jamendo entirely took about 2256 s for VP and 2808 s for 3-Index, leading to respective triple decryption rates of 465 triples/s and 374 triples/s in a cold scenario, which already fulfils the performance requirements to feed several Triple Pattern Fragments per second.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At this point we also want to stress that due to the nature of our approach, each result triple can be returned as soon as its decryption has finished. This is in line with the incremental nature of the Triple Pattern Fragment [31] approach, which paginates the query results (typically including 100 results per page), allowing users to ask for further pages if required. For example, decrypting Jamendo entirely took about 2256 s for VP and 2808 s for 3-Index, leading to respective triple decryption rates of 465 triples/s and 374 triples/s in a cold scenario, which already fulfils the performance requirements to feed several Triple Pattern Fragments per second.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In order to maintain simplicity and general applicability of the proposed store, both alternatives consider key-value backends, which are increasingly used to manage RDF data [8], especially in distributed scenarios. It is also worth mentioning that we focus on basic triple pattern queries as (i) they are the cornerstone that can be used to build more complex SPARQL queries, and (ii) they constitute all the functionality to support the Triple Pattern Fragments [31] interface. 3-Index Approach.…”
Section: Optimising Query Execution Over Encrypted Rdfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future work, we will extend the client [8] with support for this interface, so that it is able to consume data using the version query atoms for more complex queries, using an appropriate query language.…”
Section: Demonstration Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Querying on the Web is possible using the Triple Pattern Fragments ( ) framework [8], which was introduced as an alternative to endpoints [2] for publishing Linked Data at a low cost, while still enabling queryable access. The approach limits server interfaces to triple pattern queries and moves the effort of full query evaluation to the client.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HDT has been widely adopted by the community, (i) used as the main backend of Triple Pattern Fragments (TPF) [18] interface, which alleviates the traditional burden of LOD servers by moving part of the query processing onto clients, (ii) used as a storage backend for large-scale graph data [16], or (iii) as the store behind LOD Laundromat [3], serving a crawl of a very big subset of the LOD Cloud, to name but a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%