Abstract:Reorientation of the acetabulum may be required in adolescents and young adults with developmental dysplasia of the hip. We have carried out a retrospective 5,6 results of these procedures/' Although most authors argue that they reduce the risk of secondary degenerative arthri tis,7 this has never been demonstrated in clinical studies.review of 51 hips after triple osteotomy with an average We have reviewed 51 hips at between 8 and 15 years after follow-up of ten years (8 to 15). Forty-eight hips (94%) were av… Show more
“…4). Compared with the literature, Group I in the current study showed a superior survivorship rate of 90% at 10 years followup (Table 5) [5,11,17,21,26,33,44,48]. Reported survivorship rates for PAO ranged from 54% to 85% [11,17,21,33].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Reported survivorship rates for PAO ranged from 54% to 85% [11,17,21,33]. For triple and Chiari osteotomies, the reported survival rates at 10 years followup were 73% and 84%, respectively (Table 5) [5,26]. The survivorship rate in our Group II, including hips with morphologic features predisposing to FAI, was 78% and was at the lower range of the reported rates in the literature (Table 5).…”
Background Although periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) provides conceptual advantages compared with other osteotomies and reportedly is associated with joint survivorship of 60% at 20 years, the beneficial effect of proper acetabular reorientation with concomitant arthrotomy and creation of femoral head-neck offset on 10-year hip survivorship remains unclear. Questions/purposes We asked the following questions: (1) Does the 10-year survivorship of the hip after PAO improve with proper acetabular reorientation and a spherical femoral head; (2) does the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score improve; (3) can the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) be slowed; and (4)
“…4). Compared with the literature, Group I in the current study showed a superior survivorship rate of 90% at 10 years followup (Table 5) [5,11,17,21,26,33,44,48]. Reported survivorship rates for PAO ranged from 54% to 85% [11,17,21,33].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Reported survivorship rates for PAO ranged from 54% to 85% [11,17,21,33]. For triple and Chiari osteotomies, the reported survival rates at 10 years followup were 73% and 84%, respectively (Table 5) [5,26]. The survivorship rate in our Group II, including hips with morphologic features predisposing to FAI, was 78% and was at the lower range of the reported rates in the literature (Table 5).…”
Background Although periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) provides conceptual advantages compared with other osteotomies and reportedly is associated with joint survivorship of 60% at 20 years, the beneficial effect of proper acetabular reorientation with concomitant arthrotomy and creation of femoral head-neck offset on 10-year hip survivorship remains unclear. Questions/purposes We asked the following questions: (1) Does the 10-year survivorship of the hip after PAO improve with proper acetabular reorientation and a spherical femoral head; (2) does the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score improve; (3) can the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) be slowed; and (4)
“…We present a series of patients with a followup of 96% at 23 to 29 years after pelvic osteotomies. This study is a followup study after previous reports on the 8-to 15-year follow-up and a 15-year followup of triple osteotomies of the pelvis [5,22]. The purposes of this study therefore were to determine whether the triple osteotomy can provide (1) continuing pain relief and (2) function; and to determine the (3) incidence of OA and (4) number of patients undergoing THA 23 years or more after triple osteotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operative technique has been described previously [5,11]. The operation began with a separate posterior approach for the osteotomy of the ischium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other treatment modalities are the Chiari osteotomy and shelfplasty [18]. We have used a triple osteotomy since 1980 and followup studies of 10 and 15 years have been published [5,11,22]. These reports show a Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score of 15 to 18 points (''good'' to ''excellent'') in 56% of all patients with little progression of osteoarthritis (OA) and only six patients (12%) underwent a THA by 15 Dungl et al [7] described Merle d'Aubigné-Postel scores of 18 in 40% and of 15 to 17 in 32% of patients with 146 triple osteotomies.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.