2017
DOI: 10.4171/jems/748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triple Massey products and absolute Galois groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearly simultaneously with our arXiv posting of the first version of our paper, Efrat and Matzri posted [7] on arXiv. The paper [7] is a replacement of [14]. In [7], Efrat and Matzri also provide a cohomological approach to Theorem 4.10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nearly simultaneously with our arXiv posting of the first version of our paper, Efrat and Matzri posted [7] on arXiv. The paper [7] is a replacement of [14]. In [7], Efrat and Matzri also provide a cohomological approach to Theorem 4.10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper [7] is a replacement of [14]. In [7], Efrat and Matzri also provide a cohomological approach to Theorem 4.10. Their approach has a similar flavor to our proofs in this paper, but it is still different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the paper [38], this conjecture was proven for all the (one-dimensional) local and global fields. On the other hand, there is a series of recent papers [16,27,8,28] discussing and partially proving the conjecture that tuple Massey products of degree-one elements vanish in the cohomology algebra H * (G F , Z/l). The results above in this section and the discussion below show that the Koszulity conjecture implies vanishing of the tensor Massey products in H * (G F , Z/l), but may have no direct implications concerning the problem of vanishing of the tuple Massey products.…”
Section: Proof Notice That Any Morphism Of Augmented Dg-algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The example of the relation (8) illustrates how the map (11) can fail to be an isomorphism in degree 4. One says that the system of nonhomogeneous quadratic relations R ⊂ N 2 F * is self-consistent if the algebra gr N A is defined by quadratic relations, or equivalently, if the map (11) is an isomorphism in all the degrees.…”
Section: Self-consistency Of Nonhomogeneous Quadratic Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation