2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2014.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triple factorisations of the general linear group and their associated geometries

Abstract: Triple factorisations of finite groups G of the form G = P QP are essential in the study of Lie theory as well as in geometry. Geometrically, each triple factorisation G = P QP corresponds to a G-flag transitive point/line geometry such that 'each pair of points is incident with at least one line'. We call such a geometry collinearly complete, and duality (interchanging the roles of points and lines) gives rise to the notion of concurrently complete geometries. In this paper, we study triple factorisations of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bound presented in Theorem 3.6 improves the bound q + √ q − 1 from [3] for all q. It improves the bound 5 from [1] for all q ≥ 3. For q = 2, the lower bound 5 is still the best lower bound.…”
Section: Corollary 33 Let S T Q ∈ N Be Such That S ≤ T and Qmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bound presented in Theorem 3.6 improves the bound q + √ q − 1 from [3] for all q. It improves the bound 5 from [1] for all q ≥ 3. For q = 2, the lower bound 5 is still the best lower bound.…”
Section: Corollary 33 Let S T Q ∈ N Be Such That S ≤ T and Qmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It improves on the lower bound q + √ q − 1, which was proved in [3,Theorem 4] (actually, the bound proved by Beutelspacher in [3] was a little bit better). Very recently, the lower bound 5 (which is useful when q = 2) was proved in [1,Lemma 4.15]. For t = 1, this problem was already studied by Glynn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This motivated Alavi and Burness [3] to study large maximal subgroups H of finite simple groups G (i.e., |H| ≤ |G| 1/3 ). In this direction, various triple factorisations of general linear groups GL(V ) have been studied (see [1,2]). Triple factorisations Sym(Ω) = ABA of symmetric groups with A and B conjugate subgroups have been studied in [8] and Theorem 1.1 focuses on intransitive factorisations of Sym(Ω).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometries associated to (2,2,2) are simply the generalised di-gons, and their automorphism groups G give degenerate factorisations G = AB. The geometries associated to (3,3,3) and (3,3,4) are flag-transitive linear spaces which have been classified up to the one-dimensional affine case [6].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation