2017
DOI: 10.15866/irecap.v7i2.11842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triple Band CPW Fed Monopole Leaf Shaped Patch Antenna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparative study of the proposed antenna and reported antennas for 0.5–6 GHz applications in terms of antenna size, resonating frequency, bandwidth, and antenna gain is presented in Table 5. It is clearly visualized from the perusal Table 5 that the proposed antenna (840.96 mm 2 ) is more compact as compared to reported antennas 17–24 in Table 5. The proposed antenna has smaller patch area (840.96 mm 2 ) as compared to antennas (2380), 17 (2826), 18 (1800), 19 (5775), 20 (2451), 21 (2500), 22 (2250), 23 and (2250 mm 2 ) 24 with the factor of 2.83, 3.36, 2.14, 6.86, 2.91, 2.97, 2.67, and 2.67, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A comparative study of the proposed antenna and reported antennas for 0.5–6 GHz applications in terms of antenna size, resonating frequency, bandwidth, and antenna gain is presented in Table 5. It is clearly visualized from the perusal Table 5 that the proposed antenna (840.96 mm 2 ) is more compact as compared to reported antennas 17–24 in Table 5. The proposed antenna has smaller patch area (840.96 mm 2 ) as compared to antennas (2380), 17 (2826), 18 (1800), 19 (5775), 20 (2451), 21 (2500), 22 (2250), 23 and (2250 mm 2 ) 24 with the factor of 2.83, 3.36, 2.14, 6.86, 2.91, 2.97, 2.67, and 2.67, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In practical applications, multiband microstrip antennas are preferred over single band antennas as they can be easily integrated in smart devices. Owing to techniques mentioned in other studies, 3–11 researchers have found ways to overcome the challenges of microstrip patch antenna with design of π‐shaped 12 and rhombus‐shaped antenna 13 ; multilayer structure using defected ground 14 ; K‐shaped design using shorting pin 15 and parasitically coupled L‐shaped stubs 16 for dual‐band operations; a Coplanar Waveguide (CPW)‐fed leaf‐shaped antenna with defected ground 17 ; circular patch with open‐ended elliptical shape ring slots and shorting vias 18 ; metamaterial‐based design loaded with meandered line and complementary split ring resonator (CSRR) 19 ; slots loaded bow‐tie patch with tapered ground 20 ; T‐shaped slot and slits‐loaded antenna 21 ; circular patch loaded with stub, slot, and V‐shaped slit 22 ; reconfigurable antenna using a pair of PIN diodes 23 ; and pentagonal shape ring slot with E‐shaped strip using partial ground 24 for triple‐band operation have been presented for different applications in wireless system. Frequency reconfiguration and multiple input multiple output (MIMO) technology has led to the revival of multiband and wideband operations in the field of wireless applications 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Advancement in communication technology has led to the revival in the field of microstrip patch antenna. Researchers are trying to design a single antenna instead of multiple antennas for multiband applications such as dual band antennas, triple band antenna, quad band antenna penta band antenna, and hexa band antenna . The recent studies in the field of patch antenna is majorly emphasizing on X, Ku, and K bands as X band has wide application in fields of satellite, mobile, radio location, etc, and Ku/K band is primarily used for radar and broadcasting satellite television .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%