2007
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-4094
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tripeptidyl-peptidase II Controls DNA Damage Responses and In vivo γ-Irradiation Resistance of Tumors

Abstract: Cellular responses to ;-irradiation exposure are controlled by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinases (PIKK) in the nucleus, and in addition, cytosolic PIKKs may have a role in such responses. Here, we show that the expression of tripeptidyl-peptidase II (TPPII), a high molecular weight cytosolic peptidase, required PIKK signaling and that TPPII was rapidly translocated into the nucleus of ;-irradiated cells. These events were dependent on mammalian target of rapamycin, a cytosolic/mitochondrial PIKK th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar phenotype was observed in some tumors displaying resistance to apoptosis due to the compromised degradation of IAP (inhibitor of apoptosis) proteins [24]. Other reports described that TPP II induces genetic instability by overriding mitotic checkpoints [25] and that TPP is required for a normal response to DNA damage, although the latter point is controversial [26,27]. Mice with a genetic deletion of TPP II are viable but display degenerative alterations such as a decreased life span, premature immuno-hematopoietic senescence, and aggravated apoptosis [28].…”
Section: The Controversial Role Of Tripeptidyl Peptidase IImentioning
confidence: 61%
“…A similar phenotype was observed in some tumors displaying resistance to apoptosis due to the compromised degradation of IAP (inhibitor of apoptosis) proteins [24]. Other reports described that TPP II induces genetic instability by overriding mitotic checkpoints [25] and that TPP is required for a normal response to DNA damage, although the latter point is controversial [26,27]. Mice with a genetic deletion of TPP II are viable but display degenerative alterations such as a decreased life span, premature immuno-hematopoietic senescence, and aggravated apoptosis [28].…”
Section: The Controversial Role Of Tripeptidyl Peptidase IImentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Although we could not confirm the lack of radiation-induced p53 stabilization in the absence of TPPII, we nevertheless wanted to study other potential DNA damage response alterations. We therefore repeated the experiment described by Hong and colleagues (12) showing translocation of TPPII to the nucleus in EL4 cells within 1 hour after g-irradiation with 5 Gy. Like Hong and colleagues, we used immunofluorescence microscopy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Major findings were (a) up-regulation and translocation of TPPII to the nucleus on g-irradiation; (b) failure of TPPII-siRNA-expressing lymphoma cells to stabilize p53 and consequently to halt the cell cycle in the G 1 phase on g-irradiation; and (c) complete remission of subcutaneous murine EL4 lymphomas on low-dose total body irradiation combined with either intratumoral expression of TPPII-specific siRNA or systemic administration of a subtilase inhibitor, which was reported by Hong and colleagues (12) to inhibit TPPII. These findings suggested not only an unexpected role of TPPII in the DNA damage response but also a potential suitability of TPPII inhibitors as radiosensitizers for clinical use in the radiotherapy of tumors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, expressional changes of TPP2 interaction partners can also be suggested since both inhibitors alter TPP2 complex assembly and/or stability as well as localization. This may cause a shielding or exposure of domains, for instance the C-terminal BRCT-domain, that might interfere with a potential protein-stabilizing or destabilizing interaction of TPP2 (3,19,24,69). TPP2 inhibition can also change protein expression indirectly via mediator proteins.…”
Section: Proteomic Changes By Tpp2 Inhibition and Knockmentioning
confidence: 99%