2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c04334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trion Binding Energy Variation on Photoluminescence Excitation Energy and Power during Direct to Indirect Bandgap Crossover in Monolayer and Few-Layer MoS2

Abstract: The behavior of the trion and exciton photoluminescence (PL) under various laser excitation conditions, that is, energy and power, is studied in monolayer and few-layer (FL) chemical vapor deposition (CVD)-MoS2 flakes grown on SiO2/Si. The room-temperature μ-PL spectroscopy of the flakes shows that the A exciton at 1.86 eV is overlapped by the trion component. First, the thickness-dependent characterization of the flakes has been carried out. The trion spectral weight and dissociation energy are observed to in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(213 reference statements)
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The as-grown sample is characterized by a strong A − peak, typical of single-layer MoS 2 on SiO 2 /Si [38]. The presence of an intense trion peak (A − ) in fact is related to the excitation power of the laser light employed for the measurements, as explained by Golovynskyi et al [39] for experimental condition comparable with ours. Besides this, there is also a strong D peak due to the presence of MoO 3 precursor residuals, in agreement with the XPS analysis discussed above, while the contribution of the A 0 and B peaks is almost negligible.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The as-grown sample is characterized by a strong A − peak, typical of single-layer MoS 2 on SiO 2 /Si [38]. The presence of an intense trion peak (A − ) in fact is related to the excitation power of the laser light employed for the measurements, as explained by Golovynskyi et al [39] for experimental condition comparable with ours. Besides this, there is also a strong D peak due to the presence of MoO 3 precursor residuals, in agreement with the XPS analysis discussed above, while the contribution of the A 0 and B peaks is almost negligible.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The separation between X I and T II is about ∼5–7 meV higher than that between X II and T I indicating a stronger trion binding energy with the moiré trapped exciton. X II –T I is about ∼30 meV (see Figure S9), similar to the trion binding energy in 1L-MoS 2 . , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the A − /A value may change when the incident laser power is high. 50 Fortunately, the laser power used in our measurement is mild, which will not obviously influence the ratio (see Supporting Information for details).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In fact, our TEPL measurements reveal a higher A – / A ratio, indicating a higher n e (5.0 × 10 13 cm –2 ) at the wrinkle compared with that at the basal plane (3.2 × 10 13 cm –2 ) (see Table S1). Note that the A – / A value may change when the incident laser power is high . Fortunately, the laser power used in our measurement is mild, which will not obviously influence the ratio (see Supporting Information for details).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%