2019
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trinucleotide Base Pair Stacking Free Energy for Understanding TF-DNA Recognition and the Functions of SNPs

Abstract: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) affect base pair stacking, which is the primary factor for maintaining the stability of DNA. However, the mechanism of how SNPs lead to phenotype variations is still unclear. In this work, we connected SNPs and base pair stacking by a 3-mer base pair stacking free energy matrix. The SNPs with large base pair stacking free energy differences led to phenotype variations. A molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was then applied. Our results showed that base pair stacking played… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 In addition, changing the base pair sequence alters the local base stacking energies, which affect the structure and dynamics of the DNA molecule. [46][47][48] Thus, within the broader context of the DNA molecule in the assay, the second site may not be the preferred binding site for CRX-DBD or the base substitution does not disrupt the contacts between the CRX-DBD and DNA under the assay conditions. Thus, CRX binding motifs may be a marker of potential CRX binding locations but there are additional effects that dictate CRX specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 In addition, changing the base pair sequence alters the local base stacking energies, which affect the structure and dynamics of the DNA molecule. [46][47][48] Thus, within the broader context of the DNA molecule in the assay, the second site may not be the preferred binding site for CRX-DBD or the base substitution does not disrupt the contacts between the CRX-DBD and DNA under the assay conditions. Thus, CRX binding motifs may be a marker of potential CRX binding locations but there are additional effects that dictate CRX specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we had shown the effects of DNA methylation on the structure of DNA and the CRX binding motif 35 . In addition, changing the base pair sequence alters the local base stacking energies, which affect the structure and dynamics of the DNA molecule 46–48 . Thus, within the broader context of the DNA molecule in the assay, the second site may not be the preferred binding site for CRX‐DBD or the base substitution does not disrupt the contacts between the CRX‐DBD and DNA under the assay conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we had shown the effects of DNA methylation on the structure of DNA and the CRX binding motif 26 . In addition, changing the base pair sequence alters the local base stacking energies, which affect the structure and dynamics of the DNA molecule [32][33][34] . Thus, within the broader context of the DNA molecule in the assay, the second site may not be the preferred binding site for CRX-DBD or the base substitution does not disrupt the contacts between the CRX-DBD and DNA under the assay conditions.…”
Section: Conclusion/discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are extremely important genetic variations in human genes ( Martin et al, 2020 ). SNPs research is closely related to the development of pharmacogenomics and disease diagnosis, and is an important step toward the application of human genome projects ( Li et al, 2019 ). At present, there are many methods for detecting SNPs ( Uppu et al, 2016 ; Zhao et al, 2018 ; Prezza et al, 2019 ), including gene sequencing technology ( Kim et al, 2016 ), capillary electrophoresis technology ( Zhao et al, 2019 ), reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) detection ( Jones et al, 1999 ; Tonosaki et al, 2013 ), gene chip technology ( Tu et al, 2018 ), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%