2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.9b00632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trimetallic Hybrid Sulfides Embedded in Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanocubes as an Advanced Sodium-Ion Battery Anode

Abstract: Metal sulfides are promising anodes for sodium-ion batteries because of their high theoretical capacities. However, they also suffer from the limitations of poor cycling stability and rate performance caused by volumetric strain. Here, trimetallic hybrid sulfide (Ni, Fe, Co)S x nanocrystals embedded into nitrogen-doped carbon nanocubes are successfully obtained with abundant channels for ion diffusion, high specific surface area for a pseudocapacitive effect, and enough voids to buffer volumetric strain. As an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As depicted in Figure B, the b -values obtained from the linearly fitting plots of log­( i ) vs log­( v ) for the peaks 1–4 are calculated to be 1.05, 0.88, 0.90, and 0.85, respectively, signifying the dominated surface pseudocapacitive process in the composite of NiSe 2 /C-2G-500. It should be mentioned that the b -value of peak 1 is larger than 1, clearly indicating that this step of reaction is completely governed by surface pseudocapacitive behaviors, which has also been commonly reported in the literature. , In addition, the contribution from the pseudocapacitive effect to the total capacity at a specific scan rate can be quantitatively estimated based on the following equation: i = k 1 v + k 2 v 1/2 , where k 1 and k 2 are two parameters determined from the slope of iv ‑1/2 vs v 1/2 . , Basically, k 1 v represents the fraction of pseudocapacitive behavior, while k 2 v 1/2 denotes the quantity of the diffusion-controlled process . Typically, the contribution from the surface pseudocapacitive effect under 1 mV s –1 is quantified to be 87.4%, as depicted by the shadow area in Figure C.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As depicted in Figure B, the b -values obtained from the linearly fitting plots of log­( i ) vs log­( v ) for the peaks 1–4 are calculated to be 1.05, 0.88, 0.90, and 0.85, respectively, signifying the dominated surface pseudocapacitive process in the composite of NiSe 2 /C-2G-500. It should be mentioned that the b -value of peak 1 is larger than 1, clearly indicating that this step of reaction is completely governed by surface pseudocapacitive behaviors, which has also been commonly reported in the literature. , In addition, the contribution from the pseudocapacitive effect to the total capacity at a specific scan rate can be quantitatively estimated based on the following equation: i = k 1 v + k 2 v 1/2 , where k 1 and k 2 are two parameters determined from the slope of iv ‑1/2 vs v 1/2 . , Basically, k 1 v represents the fraction of pseudocapacitive behavior, while k 2 v 1/2 denotes the quantity of the diffusion-controlled process . Typically, the contribution from the surface pseudocapacitive effect under 1 mV s –1 is quantified to be 87.4%, as depicted by the shadow area in Figure C.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…where k 1 and k 2 are two parameters determined from the slope of iv -1/2 vs v 1/2 . 68, 69 Basically, k 1 v represents the fraction of pseudocapacitive behavior, while k 2 v 1/2 denotes the quantity of the diffusion-controlled process. 70 Typically, the contribution from the surface pseudocapacitive effect under 1 mV s −1 is quantified to be 87.4%, as depicted by the shadow area in Figure 6C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacitive contribution of PAZ‐CF‐900/1100 and PANIA‐CF‐700 was 78.56 %, 77.94 %, and 75.81 %, respectively (Figure S10). The high capacitive contribution of PAZ‐CF‐700 suggests that it can withstand rapid mass transfer, which is corresponding to a good rate performance [8a,40] …”
Section: Electrochemical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, trimetallic sulfides normally have a lower activation energy than that of monometallic and bimetallic sulfides, which is conducive to electron transfer, thus leading to better electron conductivity. [ 22–24 ] Moreover, the synergistic effects between trimetallic ions allow for the modification of electronic structures, which leads to more active sites and faster reaction kinetics in HER/OER. [ 25–27 ] Therefore, trimetallic sulfides have more applicable features as electrocatalysts and have the potential to outperform monometallic and bimetallic sulfides in terms of electrocatalytic property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%