1966
DOI: 10.1007/bf00436556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trigonocephalie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the transverse target SSA these effects can be distinguished by the different azimuthal angle distribution of the produced hadrons: Sivers effect ∝ sin(φ − φ S ), while Collins effect ∝ sin(φ + φ S ), where φ and φ S denote respectively the azimuthal angles of the produced hadron and the target polarization vector with respect to the axis defined by the hard virtual photon [15]. Both effects have been subject to intensive phenomenological studies in hadron-hadron-collisions [21][22][23][24][25] and in SIDIS [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. For the longitudinal target SSA in SIDIS, which were observed first [4][5][6] but are dominated by subleading-twist effects [36], the situation is less clear and their description (presuming the factorization theorems [12][13][14] can be generalized to twist-3) is more involved [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the transverse target SSA these effects can be distinguished by the different azimuthal angle distribution of the produced hadrons: Sivers effect ∝ sin(φ − φ S ), while Collins effect ∝ sin(φ + φ S ), where φ and φ S denote respectively the azimuthal angles of the produced hadron and the target polarization vector with respect to the axis defined by the hard virtual photon [15]. Both effects have been subject to intensive phenomenological studies in hadron-hadron-collisions [21][22][23][24][25] and in SIDIS [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. For the longitudinal target SSA in SIDIS, which were observed first [4][5][6] but are dominated by subleading-twist effects [36], the situation is less clear and their description (presuming the factorization theorems [12][13][14] can be generalized to twist-3) is more involved [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the currently available final HERMES and COMPASS data [9,10] were analyzed without a transverse momentum weight, and can only be interpreted by resorting to some model for the distribution of the transverse parton momenta in the "unintegrated" [40] Sivers distribution and unpolarized fragmentation function. Different models have been explored in literature [33][34][35]. Here we approximate the distribution of transverse parton momenta in the Sivers function to be Gaussian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, from the large transverse momentum quark Sivers function calculated in [13], we would already obtain the evolution equation for T F (x) (which is the transverse momentum moment of the quark Sivers function), since the collinear divergence in that calculation will lead to the splitting function of T F (x). This splitting function was confirmed by a complete calculation of next-to-leading order QCD correction to the transverse-momentum weighted spin asymmetry in Drell-Yan lepton pair production [17] and the derivations of the scale evolution equations directly [18,19]. In particular, the scale evolution for the quark-gluon correlation function T F (x) is found to be,…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Most recently, there has been very exciting progress in studying the scale evolution equations for the quark-gluon and three-gluon correlation functions and their implications to the energy dependence of the relevant SSA observables [17,18,19]. General structure of the evolution equations for the twist-three quark-gluon correlation functions has been known in the literature [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation