1994
DOI: 10.1021/ic00088a011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trigonal Bipyramidal and Related Molecules of the Main Group Elements: Investigation of Apparent Exceptions to the VSEPR Model through the Analysis of the Laplacian of the Electron Density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sulfur tetrafluoride has previously been analyzed using QTAIM by Gillespie et al at the HF/6-311G** level of theory. [27] The AIM results in this study are in good agreement with those reported previously,w here any deviations result from the difference in the level of theory used. The formation of the adducts is accompanied by ar eduction in the atomic basin chargeso ns ulfur (SF 4 2.648, SF 4 ·NC 5 H 5 2.548, SF 4 ·4-NC 5 H 4 (CH 3 ) 2.548, SF 4 ·2,6-NC 5 H 3 (CH 3 ) 2 2.600, SF 4 ·4-NC 5 H 4 N(CH 3 ) 2 2.506, SF 4 ·N(C 2 H 5 ) 3 2.499), as the nitrogen serves as an attractor.C orrespondingly,t here is an increase in negative charge in the ni- trogen atomicb asin upon adduct formation.T he atomic basin charge on F 1 becomes more negative upon adduct formation (SF 4 À0.670,S F 4 ·NC 5 H 5 À0.681, SF 4 ·4-NC 5 H 4 (CH 3 ) À0.681, SF 4 ·2,6-NC 5 H 3 (CH 3 ) 2 À0.681, SF 4 ·4-NC 5 H 4 N(CH 3 ) 2 À0.683, SF 4 ·N(C 2 H 5 ) 3 À0.685), whereas those of F 2 ,F 3 ,a nd F 4 are unaltered.…”
Section: Atoms In Molecules Analysissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Sulfur tetrafluoride has previously been analyzed using QTAIM by Gillespie et al at the HF/6-311G** level of theory. [27] The AIM results in this study are in good agreement with those reported previously,w here any deviations result from the difference in the level of theory used. The formation of the adducts is accompanied by ar eduction in the atomic basin chargeso ns ulfur (SF 4 2.648, SF 4 ·NC 5 H 5 2.548, SF 4 ·4-NC 5 H 4 (CH 3 ) 2.548, SF 4 ·2,6-NC 5 H 3 (CH 3 ) 2 2.600, SF 4 ·4-NC 5 H 4 N(CH 3 ) 2 2.506, SF 4 ·N(C 2 H 5 ) 3 2.499), as the nitrogen serves as an attractor.C orrespondingly,t here is an increase in negative charge in the ni- trogen atomicb asin upon adduct formation.T he atomic basin charge on F 1 becomes more negative upon adduct formation (SF 4 À0.670,S F 4 ·NC 5 H 5 À0.681, SF 4 ·4-NC 5 H 4 (CH 3 ) À0.681, SF 4 ·2,6-NC 5 H 3 (CH 3 ) 2 À0.681, SF 4 ·4-NC 5 H 4 N(CH 3 ) 2 À0.683, SF 4 ·N(C 2 H 5 ) 3 À0.685), whereas those of F 2 ,F 3 ,a nd F 4 are unaltered.…”
Section: Atoms In Molecules Analysissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although the arguments presented here are developed for d 10 -ML 2 complexes, similar arguments account for the nonlinear structures observed for d 0 metal complexes with π-donating ligands [79][80][81][82][83]. Furthermore, similar reasoning is expected to account for a related effect described for d 8 -M(CO) 2 L 2 complexes by Eisenstein and Caulton, where strong π-accepting ligands induce non-planarity [84,85].…”
Section: The Effect Of Metal Variationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For example, whereas CO 2 and NO 2 + are linear and in accord with the model, CaF 2 , BaH 2, TiO 2 , VO 2 + , and CrO 2 + are bent in clear violation of the VESPR model. 45,46 Since L(r) is a physical property of a system and model independent, its topology should differ between that for main group molecules and those containing a metal atom to account for their differing geometries, and this is indeed the case. In the latter cases it is found that the outer core of the metal (with the shells of the core density defined by L(r)) is polarized to create CCs that unlike their adjacency to the ligands in main group molecules, are diagonally opposed to the positions of the ligands, giving rise to ligand-opposed CCs.…”
Section: Iv1 Example Of the Density Explaining And Correcting The Fmentioning
confidence: 99%