2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triggering technological innovation through cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A micro-foundational perspective

Abstract: Over the past 30 plus years, the development of technological innovation through cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As) has captured an increasing amount of attention in business research and practice. The emerging literature on the topic addresses a significant phenomenon, however, it lacks theoretical underpinning and a cumulative empirical inquiry, from a micro-foundational perspective. Hence, a systematic and integrative research effort seems justified. Accordingly, we systematically review and analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We searched for relevant literature in three major electronic databases: EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate, Science Direct and Emerald. These databases were chosen because they provide the greatest coverage (Christofi et al, 2017; Christofi, Vrontis, et al, 2019) and are frequently used by state‐of‐the‐art systematic reviews (Christofi, Vrontis, Thrassou, et al., 2019; Leonidou et al., 2018; Pittaway et al., 2004; Vrontis & Christofi, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We searched for relevant literature in three major electronic databases: EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate, Science Direct and Emerald. These databases were chosen because they provide the greatest coverage (Christofi et al, 2017; Christofi, Vrontis, et al, 2019) and are frequently used by state‐of‐the‐art systematic reviews (Christofi, Vrontis, Thrassou, et al., 2019; Leonidou et al., 2018; Pittaway et al., 2004; Vrontis & Christofi, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This general objective is broken down into the following specific objectives: (1) To assess the academic impact of the research topic, and (2) to determine the structure of the research topic. Following recent literature reviews on M&A [5,6], the research questions are settled as RQ1. Which are the main studies and research articles in the literature that link M&A and sustainability?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other academics, such as Gadiesh et al (2001), stipulated additional factors: increased competitive pressure stemming from the external market environment; maintaining the company's market position; seeking a competitive advantage; achieving diversity and growth. The existent literature indicates that M&As offer the easiest and most popular way to achieve this aim is through mergers or acquisitions (Mavrides and Hadjichristodoulou, 2009;Klendauer and Deller, 2009;Collett, 2015;Liu et al, 2018;Christofi et al, 2019;Rossi et al, 2015). Empirical studies support that more than half of M&As fail to produce results, often resulting in breaking even (Jayesh, 2013;Bansal, 2015;Chiriac and Georgescu, 2015;Newton, 2015).…”
Section: Historical and Functional Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%