2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1889(99)00053-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trigger–target rules and the dynamics of aggregate money holdings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Counter-example to smooth-adjustment intuition: empirical frequency of balances (m) with total M 4M .12 Greene (2001) explores the very complex nature of Miller-Orr dynamic transitions and develops modifications of the non-linear comparativestatic MB&W model to allow for these dynamics.13 Another possibility in smooth-adjustment modeling is to use a transition variable formed as changes of some of the variables determining demand,if not DM then changes in interest rates or changes in income. In this case the characterization of smooth-adjustment as dynamic and the MB&W model as static still applies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Counter-example to smooth-adjustment intuition: empirical frequency of balances (m) with total M 4M .12 Greene (2001) explores the very complex nature of Miller-Orr dynamic transitions and develops modifications of the non-linear comparativestatic MB&W model to allow for these dynamics.13 Another possibility in smooth-adjustment modeling is to use a transition variable formed as changes of some of the variables determining demand,if not DM then changes in interest rates or changes in income. In this case the characterization of smooth-adjustment as dynamic and the MB&W model as static still applies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%