1988
DOI: 10.1002/ana.410230404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trigeminal evoked potentials following brief air puff: Enhanced signal‐to‐noise ratio

Abstract: Trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials (TSEPs) were studied by using fast-rising air puffs generated by a high-speed air control system. Within 100 ms, air puff stimulation of the face elicited three negative and three positive components over the contralateral, as well as the ipsilateral, sensory area. The air puff TSEPs showed a uniform change in peak latencies and amplitudes as a function of stimulus intensity. The bilateral distribution of the TSEPs stands in sharp contrast to the exclusively contralat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
17
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the organization of the somatosensory cortex in adults, and prior work with older infants, we expected that neural responses to left hand stimulation would be maximal over lateral central electrode sites in the contralateral (right) hemisphere, and that responses to left foot stimulation would be maximal over midline electrode sites. In contrast, responses to midline lip stimulation were expected to be bilaterally represented across the central region, in line with adult studies (Hashimoto, ; Hoshiyama et al., ; Tamura, Shibukawa, Shintani, Kaneko, & Ichinohe, ). We further hypothesized that stimulation of infants’ lips would be associated with a particularly prominent response in the infant SEP.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Based on the organization of the somatosensory cortex in adults, and prior work with older infants, we expected that neural responses to left hand stimulation would be maximal over lateral central electrode sites in the contralateral (right) hemisphere, and that responses to left foot stimulation would be maximal over midline electrode sites. In contrast, responses to midline lip stimulation were expected to be bilaterally represented across the central region, in line with adult studies (Hashimoto, ; Hoshiyama et al., ; Tamura, Shibukawa, Shintani, Kaneko, & Ichinohe, ). We further hypothesized that stimulation of infants’ lips would be associated with a particularly prominent response in the infant SEP.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…MEG dipole analysis was used by Kakigi to identify the somatosensory evoked field (SEF) waveform components arising from the electrical stimulation of the index finger. The short and mid latency dipoles labeled 1M, 2M, 3M, 4M (essentially the magnetic equivalents of the N30, P50, N65 and P80 responses shown by Arnfred and colleagues) localized to the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) (Hashimoto, 1988; Kakigi et al, 2000). In another MEG dipole study, peak responses localized to the contralateral SI at 20–40 ms latencies but to the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) at later (100–140 ms) latencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, especially the analysis of datasets 5–10 might be affected by the auditory response (Nikouline et al, 1999). The somatosensory response due to scalp nerve activation is likely to have a smaller contribution to the observed changes, since the studied channels were located close to the stimulation site and the somatosensory responses from the scalp are seen on the contralateral hemisphere (Bennett and Jannetta, 1980; Hashimoto, 1988). However, in the future, sham-TMS measurements would be useful to quantify the auditory and somatosensory artifacts in MSS and SV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%