DOI: 10.29007/q7h3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trie Based Subsumption and Improving the pi-Trie Algorithm

Abstract: An algorithm that stores the prime implicates of a propositional logical formula in a trie was developed in [10]. In this paper, an improved version of that pi-trie algorithm is presented. It achieves its speedup primarily by significantly decreasing subsumption testing. Preliminary experiments indicate the new algorithm to be substantially faster and the trie based subsumption tests to be considerably more efficient than the clause by clause approach originally employed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [34], a branch-by-branch analysis leads to the algorithm introduced there. In [35], a set oriented characterization is not only more intuitive but leads to a more efficient version of the algorithm. The added efficiency stems from three improvements.…”
Section: Leaving the Original Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [34], a branch-by-branch analysis leads to the algorithm introduced there. In [35], a set oriented characterization is not only more intuitive but leads to a more efficient version of the algorithm. The added efficiency stems from three improvements.…”
Section: Leaving the Original Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in performance of the newer algorithm over the original is quite dramatic: Figure 15 compares (in log scale) the pi-trie algorithm from [34] to the updated version in [35], using the recursive, trie-based and operators. The input for both algorithms is a 15-variable 3-CNF with varying numbers of clauses and the runtimes averaged over 20 trials.…”
Section: Leaving the Original Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation