2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11139-006-0242-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tridiagonal pairs and the quantum affine algebra $${\boldmath U_q({\widehat {sl}}_2)}$$

Abstract: Let K denote an algebraically closed field and let q denote a nonzero scalar in K that is not a root of unity. Let V denote a vector space over K with finite positive dimension and let A, A * denote a tridiagonal pair on V . Let θ 0 , θ 1 , . . . , θ d (resp. θ * 0 , θ * 1 , . . . , θ * d ) denote a standard ordering of the eigenvalues of A (resp. A * ). We assume there exist nonzero scalars a, a * in K such that θ i = aq 2i−d and θ * i = a * q d−2i for 0 ≤ i ≤ d. We display two irreducible U q ( sl 2 )-module… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
117
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
117
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Having these equations, we can now consider the action of W (N +1) 1 on the eigenvectors, using (17). Let us first consider the domain j ∈ {1, ..., N n }:…”
Section: Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having these equations, we can now consider the action of W (N +1) 1 on the eigenvectors, using (17). Let us first consider the domain j ∈ {1, ..., N n }:…”
Section: Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The x ij satisfy Definition 6.1(ii) by [19,Theorems 7.1,10.1,10.2]. The x ij satisfy Definition 6.1(iii) by [19,Theorem 12.1]. We have now shown that the transformations x ij satisfy the defining relations for ⊠ q .…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 103mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The x ij satisfy Definition 6.1(i) by the construction. The x ij satisfy Definition 6.1(ii) by [19,Theorems 7.1,10.1,10.2]. The x ij satisfy Definition 6.1(iii) by [19,Theorem 12.1].…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 103mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For g = a (1) n , it can be understood as a q−deformation of the sl n+1 -Onsager algebra introduced by Uglov and Ivanov [UI]. By analogy with the sl 2 case [B,IT2], an algebra homomorphism from O q ( g) to a coideal subalgebra of the Drinfeld-Jimbo [Dr,J1] quantum universal enveloping algebra U q ( g) is known [BB] (see also [Ko]). Realizations in terms of finite dimensional quantum algebras can be also considered (see for instance [BF]): using either the coideal subalgebras of U q (g) studied by Letzter [Le] or the non-standard U ′ q (so n ) introduced by Klimyk, Gavrilik and Iorgov [GI, Klim].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%