1981
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.47.1740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tricritical Behavior in KMnF3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[110] axis [36,37]. Extrapolating their data to room temperature leads to a critical stress of 1.34 GPa, which is significantly smaller than the isotropic critical pressure of 3.4 GPa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[110] axis [36,37]. Extrapolating their data to room temperature leads to a critical stress of 1.34 GPa, which is significantly smaller than the isotropic critical pressure of 3.4 GPa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrostatic pressure-(p-) induced TCP have been observed for KDP, BaTiO 3 , PbTiO 3 and other ferroelectric crystals, as summarized in reviews by Srinivasan et al [5] and Gesi [6]. Uniaxial pressure (X) induces a change † from a first-order to a second-order PT for RbCaF 3 [7], KMnF 3 [8], and SrTiO 3 [9]. The review by Müller [10] summarizes the application of uniaxial stress in studies of a variety of multicritical points and suggested the possibility of their observation in SrTiO 3 and KMnF 3 .…”
Section: Koralewski Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Hidaka et al (1975) 25 81 88 91 Benard and Walker (1976) 26 80 89 184 Holt and Fossheim (1981) 27 187. 2 Stokka et al (1981) 4 186.9 Sakashita et al (1981) 5 186.7 28 83/84 87.7 ± 0.1 95 188 Hidaka et al (1986) 29 83 88 88 Hidaka et al (1989) 30 83 92 83 88.0 Sakashita et al (1990) 6 186 * Gibaud et al (1991) 1 82 88 186.5 Ratuszna and Kachel (1992) 31 91 186 Kapusta et al (1999) 32 96 195 * Hayward et al (2000) 11 186.0 Watanabe et al (2006) 33 81-84 Salazar et al (2007) 34 79. 35 91.0 186.7 * Salje et al (2009) 36 186.0 * Salje and Zhang (2009) 37 184 Kizhaev and Markova (2011) 38 82 phase IV as it is the typical low-temperature structure of most perovskites with both Rand M-point tilting, including NaMnF 3 and NH 4 MnF 3 for example.…”
Section: Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cubic (P m3m) → tetragonal (I 4/mcm) transition is weakly first order but close to tricritical in character. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Values of T c1 from the literature are in the range 184-189 K, and there are only two outliers at 195 K ( Table I). The space groups of phases III and IV have not been determined, but single-crystal diffraction patterns from phase III reveal the presence of both R-point and M-point reflections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%