2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trichinella infection in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from a protected area of Argentina and its relationship with the presence of humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in Chile, the cougar and the wild boar are the only species that represent any evidence of a possibly existing sylvatic cycle of Trichinella (García, et al, 2005;Hidalgo, et al, 2013). In contrast, in Argentina, Trichinella has been documented in wild boar (Cohen, et al, 2010), and it has also been found in the armadillo (Chaetophractus villosus), the central pericote (Graomys centralis), and in a species of fox (Lycalopex gymnocerus gracilis) (Minoprio, et al, 1967;Krivokapich, et al, 2006). In addition, another species, T. patagoniensis, is also reported circulating among Argentinean cougars (Krivokapich, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in Chile, the cougar and the wild boar are the only species that represent any evidence of a possibly existing sylvatic cycle of Trichinella (García, et al, 2005;Hidalgo, et al, 2013). In contrast, in Argentina, Trichinella has been documented in wild boar (Cohen, et al, 2010), and it has also been found in the armadillo (Chaetophractus villosus), the central pericote (Graomys centralis), and in a species of fox (Lycalopex gymnocerus gracilis) (Minoprio, et al, 1967;Krivokapich, et al, 2006). In addition, another species, T. patagoniensis, is also reported circulating among Argentinean cougars (Krivokapich, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevalence estimates depend on the geographical region and the detection methods used: Trichinella antibodies were found in 0.35 % of pigs in the Netherlands (van der Giessen et al 2007), 0.2 % of wild boar muscle samples contained Trichinella in Spain (Boadella et al 2012), a 0.37 % prevalence was estimated in pigs in the northeastern United States (Gamble et al 1999), in China prevalence data ranged from 0.01 to 29.95 % by serological testing to 0-5.75 % in pigs slaughtered at abattoirs, respectively (Cui and Wang 2011), 19.9 % Vietnam pigs tested positive by E/S ELISA (Vu Thi et al 2010), antibody prevalence was 0.0002-0.0003 % in wild boars in France (Pozio et al 1996), a prevalence of 1.3 % was established for wild boars in Finland (Oivanen et al 2002) and of 11.4 % wild boars in Argentina by artificial digestion (Cohen et al 2010). Despite a broad spectrum of hosts, Trichinella spp.…”
Section: Trichinellamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today in Argentina, there are endemic, nonendemic and Trichinella-free provinces [4]; however, infected animals have been recently discovered in some areas which were considered until now Trichinella-free, such as in the National Park Administration, located in the Centre-east of the Entre Rios province, along the western riverside of the Uruguay River, where 11.4% of tested wild boars were found to be infected with T. spiralis although with a low parasite burden [5]. In the period between 1990 and 2005, a total of 5,221 human cases were reported with an average incidence of 1.48%, caused by domestic pig meat consumption [2].…”
Section: Region Of the Americas Argentine Republicmentioning
confidence: 99%