2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60419-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tribological Size Effects in Sheet Metal Forming Measured by a Strip Drawing Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the maximum point of the curve FEM-50 is about 8% lower than that of EXP-50. The reason for this might be the assumption in the calculation model: The normal pressure at the radius is uniform [1]. However, the simulation shows two local contact zones, see figure 6.…”
Section: Scaled Strip Drawing Testsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the maximum point of the curve FEM-50 is about 8% lower than that of EXP-50. The reason for this might be the assumption in the calculation model: The normal pressure at the radius is uniform [1]. However, the simulation shows two local contact zones, see figure 6.…”
Section: Scaled Strip Drawing Testsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This causes the so called size effects, i.e. the occurrence of unexpected results concerning the forming force of the forming limit [1]. Since deep drawing is essentially affected by the friction between the work piece and tools [2,3], which is also affected by the size effects [4,5], the tribological size effects in sheet metal forming were investigated in our former work [6,7] and the sizedependent friction functions were acquired.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In opposite manner a larger drawing radius reduces the width of high pressure forming area, more lubricant pockets are open and the friction increase due to less surface separation. In comparison to macro scale the overall higher friction in micro deep drawing is a result of the geometrical size effect [11]. The roughness of contact surface is not scaled down by the specimen size.…”
Section: Matec Web Of Conferencesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Fleck and Johnson [4,5] suggested that the roll deformed to a non-circular profile and a neutral region of no-slip existed in the roll bite for finite reductions of the strip, and plastic reduction occurred near the rolling entry and rolling exit zones. For scale-down size effect, Vollertsen and Hu [6] analysed tribological size effects in sheet metal forming. An open and closed pockets theory has been proposed to analyse this scaled down effect on material surface deformation behaviour in micro forming process [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%