2022
DOI: 10.3390/coatings12050557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tribological Properties of the 40Cr/GCr15 Tribo-Pair under Unidirectional Rotary and Reciprocating Dry Sliding

Abstract: The unidirectional rotary and reciprocating sliding experiments of the 40Cr pin/GCr15 disc tribo-pair were carried out on the MFT-5000 Rtec friction and wear tester under the same test conditions with a sliding speed of 0.2 m/s and a load of 150 N. Compared with reciprocating sliding, the tribo-pair in rotary sliding exhibits a stabler friction coefficient and better wear resistance. By analyzing the wear surface morphologies of the two pins, the main wear mechanism was found to be adhesive wear. For the tribo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the interfacial medium, the debris (developed during interactive sliding) may cause a larger friction coefficient (CoF) and significant fluctuations under reciprocating sliding [12]. Therefore, in comparison, the tribo-pair in rotary sliding exhibits a stabler friction coefficient (CoF) and better wear resistance and is presumably good for laboratory scale testing [13]. In addition, the stroke of reciprocating sliding is shorter than that of rotary sliding, and the heat dissipation is slower, which intensified the formation and propagation of surface microcracks and the detachment of debris from the matrix which leads to the lot of fluctuation in friction and wear data [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the interfacial medium, the debris (developed during interactive sliding) may cause a larger friction coefficient (CoF) and significant fluctuations under reciprocating sliding [12]. Therefore, in comparison, the tribo-pair in rotary sliding exhibits a stabler friction coefficient (CoF) and better wear resistance and is presumably good for laboratory scale testing [13]. In addition, the stroke of reciprocating sliding is shorter than that of rotary sliding, and the heat dissipation is slower, which intensified the formation and propagation of surface microcracks and the detachment of debris from the matrix which leads to the lot of fluctuation in friction and wear data [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under unidirectional rotary sliding, the severely deformed vortex structure with high microhardness and brittleness was formed in the tribo-layer. The reason for the difficulty in forming the vortex structure in reciprocating sliding may have been the relatively high stacking fault energy and insufficient strain rate [13].
Figure 2 Tribo-testing of Ti6Al4V specimens at Insitu experimental conditions (front and side views).
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%