2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tribological properties of glass/carbon hybrid composites through inter-ply arrangement using Response Surface Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The KS value obtained experimentally for CF-PLA composite at optimised condition was lower in comparison to PLA composite. KS value of PLA composite was reduced due to higher load bearing capacity along with increased strength and stiffness by reinforcement of carbon fibers, the obtained results are in line with the previous literature works [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Effect Of Carbon Fiber On Density Of Pla Compositesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The KS value obtained experimentally for CF-PLA composite at optimised condition was lower in comparison to PLA composite. KS value of PLA composite was reduced due to higher load bearing capacity along with increased strength and stiffness by reinforcement of carbon fibers, the obtained results are in line with the previous literature works [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Effect Of Carbon Fiber On Density Of Pla Compositesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Pramendra et al, [17] showed that specific wear rate and CoF of PLA composites can be reduced significantly by using natural fibers as reinforcements. Response surface methodology (RSM) serves as a good statistical tool for analysis and optimization of responses efficiently with minimum number of trials [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimizing the responses using RSM technique aids in identifying the specific parameters which leads to minimal rate of wear [23,24]. The inputs provided in the optimization process are target (0.0003556 mm 3 /m), lower (10 N) and upper (40 N) bounds.…”
Section: Optimization Of a Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four factors like sliding velocity, normal load, sliding distance, and fiber content are considered as independent variables and wear rate as a response. 21,22 Factors and their stages are given in Table 3.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%