2014
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.879.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tribological Properties of 316L Stainless Steel Fabricated via Metal Injection Molding

Abstract: The tribological properties of sintered 316L stainless steel fabricated via injection molding were investigated. Tests were carried out at room temperature comparing metal injection molded dog bone tensile samples at different sintering temperatures. The parameter used for the pin on disk test is a 10kN load, 500m sliding distance and a chromium steel ball as a sliding partner. The morphologies and compositions of the worn surfaces were analyzed by SEM, Raman and XPS. The results showed that the wear mechanism… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the tribology test, stainless steel was known to show optimum properties in density, hardness, and wear rate. Thus, steel via MIM shows a promising future for tribological material [ 19 ]. A series of Vickers hardness measurements was carried out on the samples with polished surfaces under the load of 200 g, with a holding time of 10 s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the tribology test, stainless steel was known to show optimum properties in density, hardness, and wear rate. Thus, steel via MIM shows a promising future for tribological material [ 19 ]. A series of Vickers hardness measurements was carried out on the samples with polished surfaces under the load of 200 g, with a holding time of 10 s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test method for tribology was run according to ASTM G 99-04 Standard Test Method for Wear Testing with a Pin-on -Disk Apparatus [5]. Immediately prior to testing, and prior to measuring or weighing, specimens were cleaned and dried.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specimen was then removed and any loose wear debris was cleaned off. The existence of features on or near the wear scar was noted such as: protrusions, displaced metal, discoloration, micro cracking, or spotting [5]. Then the specimen was reweighed to the nearest 0.001 g. The test was repeated with additional specimens to obtain sufficient data for statistically significant results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%